From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: Btrfs experimental branch rebased Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:26:55 -0500 Message-ID: <1235075215.28724.45.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> References: <1234969860.23031.18.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Steven Pratt To: linux-btrfs Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1234969860.23031.18.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> List-ID: On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 10:11 -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > Hello everyone, > > My experimental performance fixes would occasionally trigger corruptions > under load, so I've folded an incremental fix back in and rebased the > experimental branch. This was done to prevent git bisects later on from > landing on the bad commit and corrupting some poor tester's FS. > This seems to be a daily operation, which isn't too surprising because right now I'm trying to use the experimental branch as a way to integrate Josef's work and mine frequently. Today's rebase includes some crucial fixes for my delayed reference modifications, including crash fixes during btrfs-vol -b. I've got Josef's latest enospc patches, and I reordered them before the more experimental performance updates. The goal is to get the enospc work stable for 2.6.29-rc, and pull those over to the main branch. -chris