public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ronny H. Kavli" <ronny.kavli@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Inconsistent reports after disk-error.
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:45:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1263854740.6829.20.camel@bollox.stuffit.loc> (raw)

I've been running btrfs on some disks with Ubuntu kernel 2.6.31 for a
while now. Recently I had a bad USB-cable to one of those disks which
left the btrfs filesystem in a somewhat sad state. Fair enough.

What worries me is what btrfsck reports back to me during two successive
runs:
root@bollox:/home/kavli# btrfsck /dev/mapper/vg3-vbox1 
checksum verify failed on 142837022720 wanted 5D18D333 found 95085E8
checksum verify failed on 142837022720 wanted 5D18D333 found 95085E8
checksum verify failed on 142837022720 wanted 5D18D333 found 95085E8
btrfsck: disk-io.c:741: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root->node)'
failed.
Aborted
root@bollox:/home/kavli# btrfsck /dev/mapper/vg3-vbox1 
checksum verify failed on 142837022720 wanted 5D18D333 found 81D15E8
checksum verify failed on 142837022720 wanted 5D18D333 found 81D15E8
checksum verify failed on 142837022720 wanted 5D18D333 found 81D15E8
btrfsck: disk-io.c:741: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root->node)'
failed.
Aborted

I'd expected the checksums for the two separate runs to be equal.

This is a vanilla filesystem that resides on one physical disk:
root@bollox:/home/kavli# btrfs-show /dev/mapper/vg3-vbox1 
failed to read /dev/sr0
Label: none  uuid: 08078f2f-22e0-4b79-8367-66528791afff
        Total devices 1 FS bytes used 106.79GB
        devid    1 size 232.88GB used 218.04GB
path /dev/mapper/vg3-vbox1

Btrfs Btrfs v0.19

I've googled a bit and found one case with a similar problem in a raid1
setup (I guess incorrectly stated as raid0):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg03429.html

There were no followups beyond that point which stated the cause of this
behaviour.

BTW: Is there any hope of recovery of this filesystem, or is it just a
new mkfs that can help?

Regards,

 -- RHK


             reply	other threads:[~2010-01-18 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-18 22:45 Ronny H. Kavli [this message]
2010-01-18 22:59 ` Inconsistent reports after disk-error Ronny H. Kavli
2010-01-20 21:35 ` Chris Mason
2010-01-20 21:36 ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1263854740.6829.20.camel@bollox.stuffit.loc \
    --to=ronny.kavli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox