From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:806 Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 11:19:56 -0500 Message-ID: <1291306746-sup-1916@think> References: <201012011411.02352.johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linux-btrfs To: Johannes Hirte Return-path: In-reply-to: <201012011411.02352.johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de> List-ID: Excerpts from Johannes Hirte's message of 2010-12-01 08:11:01 -0500: > On one of my machines with btrfs I got this bug: > > entry offset 29085974528, bytes 4096, bitmap no > entry offset 29162995712, bytes 20480, bitmap yes > entry offset 29171744768, bytes 4096, bitmap no > block group has cluster?: no > 0 blocks of free space at or bigger than bytes is > block group 29834084352 has 1073741824 bytes, 1072648192 used 0 pinned 0 reserved Well, you've had an ENOSPC explosion. > > The "block group" messages where way more, too much for the dmesg log buffer. > Kernel is a 2.6.37-rc3+ without the latest btrfs-fixes. The bug occurred when > compiling openoffice.org. After the bug a 'df -h' showed: > > df -h: > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > rootfs 21G 17G 770M 96% / > /dev/root 21G 17G 770M 96% / > rc-svcdir 1.0M 108K 916K 11% /lib/rc/init.d > udev 10M 116K 9.9M 2% /dev > shm 1013M 0 1013M 0% /dev/shm > /dev/sda2 66G 46G 20G 71% /home > /dev/sdb1 75G 56G 19G 75% /mnt/windows Which of these filesystems were you compiling on? -chris