linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <yanzheng@21cn.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: do not loop through raid types when looking for free extent
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:33:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292290233-sup-3270@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikXh1di6qoN5EgCdbH+20ZCzSdOD8UcXja-Sn_c@mail.gmail.com>

Excerpts from Yan, Zheng's message of 2010-11-16 20:38:23 -0500:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:22 AM, Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> wrote=
:
> > There is a bug in find_free_extent where if we don't find a free ex=
tent in the
> > raid type we are looking for, we loop through to the next raid type=
=2E =C2=A0This is
> > not ok since we need to make sure we honor the raid types we are gi=
ven. =C2=A0So
> > instead kill this check and get the proper index for the raid type =
we want from
> > the allocator. =C2=A0Thanks,
> >
>=20
> Loop through raid types is for handling failure in the middle of raid=
 type
> conversion.

The problem is that nothing prevents it from looping back to a raid0
chunk when we really want raid1 or raid10.  And mkfs leaves behind a
small raid0 chunk (4MB) that is uses as it assembles all the devices.

I confirmed that we often use the small raid0 chunk even in raid1 or
raid10.

Please take a look at this commit:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git;a=3D=
commit;h=3D83a50de97fe96aca82389e061862ed760ece2283

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-14  1:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-16 21:22 [PATCH] Btrfs: do not loop through raid types when looking for free extent Josef Bacik
2010-11-17  1:37 ` Yan, Zheng 
2010-11-17  2:31   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-17  1:38 ` Yan, Zheng 
2010-12-14  1:33   ` Chris Mason [this message]
2010-12-14  1:54     ` Yan, Zheng 
2010-12-14  1:59       ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1292290233-sup-3270@think \
    --to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yanzheng@21cn.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).