From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@Oracle.COM>
To: Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: version
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:03:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295917366-sup-2191@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D3E012E.4070208@csamuel.org>
Excerpts from Chris Samuel's message of 2011-01-24 17:46:06 -0500:
> On 25/01/11 08:39, Helmut Hullen wrote:
>
> > Regard the difference between "df" and "btrfs filesystem df".
>
> I suspect this is fixed in 2.6.38 with the following commit.
>
> BE WARNED: there are some fairly hairy changes to the pathname
> lookup code to replace the BKL with RCU (not specific to btrfs)
> and so if you are tempted to try it (currently 2.6.38-rc2) only
> do so on a system that you don't care about data on and/or have
> very good incremental backups of which you trust...
Yes, and you can pull in these commits on top of 2.6.37 or 2.6.36 by
pulling in the btrfs-unstable git tree. But I do agree they should fix
it.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-25 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-20 21:06 btrfs, broken design? Benoît Thiébault
2011-01-20 21:20 ` Chris Mason
2011-01-21 5:25 ` Benoît Thiébault
2011-01-21 6:46 ` Chester
2011-01-21 8:11 ` Benoît Thiébault
2011-01-21 8:21 ` Hubert Kario
2011-01-21 9:54 ` version (was: btrfs, broken design?) Helmut Hullen
2011-01-21 12:21 ` Hugo Mills
2011-01-21 14:10 ` version Helmut Hullen
2011-01-21 14:32 ` version (was: btrfs, broken design?) Diego Calleja
2011-01-21 14:55 ` version Helmut Hullen
2011-01-21 15:12 ` version Hugo Mills
2011-01-21 15:19 ` version Helmut Hullen
2011-01-24 3:20 ` version Chris Samuel
2011-01-24 8:33 ` version Helmut Hullen
2011-01-24 21:14 ` version Johannes Hirte
2011-01-24 21:39 ` version Helmut Hullen
2011-01-24 22:46 ` version Chris Samuel
2011-01-25 1:03 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2011-01-25 6:43 ` version Helmut Hullen
2011-01-25 14:37 ` version Helmut Hullen
2011-01-27 5:02 ` 2.6.38-rc2 oops's when rebalancing on different size drives (was Re: version) Chris Samuel
2011-01-27 7:45 ` version Chris Mason
2011-01-27 8:16 ` version Helmut Hullen
2011-01-27 13:28 ` version Helmut Hullen
2011-01-27 13:49 ` no space left (was: version) Helmut Hullen
2011-01-26 10:13 ` version (was: btrfs, broken design?) Erik Logtenberg
2011-01-26 14:13 ` Diego Calleja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295917366-sup-2191@think \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=chris@csamuel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).