From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Cc: Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Tree fragmentation and prefetching
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:32:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300908672-sup-9552@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D89F03A.9050306@gmx.net>
Excerpts from Arne Jansen's message of 2011-03-23 09:06:02 -0400:
> While looking into the performance of scrub I noticed that a significant
> amount of time is being used for loading the extent tree and the csum
> tree. While this is no surprise I did some prototyping on how to improve
> on it.
> The main idea is to load the tree (or parts of it) top-down, order the
> needed blocks and distribute it over all disks.
> To keep you interested, some results first.
>
> a) by tree enumeration with reada=2
> reading extent tree: 242s
> reading csum tree: 140s
> reading both trees: 324s
>
> b) prefetch prototype
> reading extent tree: 23.5s
> reading csum tree: 20.4s
> reading both trees: 25.7s
Very nice, btrfsck does something similar.
>
> The test setup consists of a 7 Seagate ES.2 1TB disks filesystem, filled
> 28%. It is created with the current git tree + the round robin patch and
> filled with
>
> fs_mark -D 512 -t 16 -n 4096 -F -S0
>
> The 'normal' read is done by enumerating the leaves by btrfs_next_leaf()
> with path->reada=2. Both trees are being enumerated one after the other.
> The prototype currently just uses raw bios, does not make use of the
> page cache and does not enter the read pages into the cache. This will
> probably add some overhead. It also does not check the crcs.
>
> While it is very promising to implement it for scrub, I think a more
> general interface which can be used for every enumeration would be
> beneficial. Use cases that come to mind are rebalance, reflink, deletion
> of large files, listing of large directories etc..
>
> I'd imagine an interface along the lines of
>
> int btrfs_readahead_init(struct btrfs_reada_ctx *reada);
> int btrfs_readahead_add(struct btrfs_root *root,
> struct btrfs_key *start,
> struct btrfs_key *end,
> struct btrfs_reada_ctx *reada);
> void btrfs_readahead_wait(struct btrfs_reada_ctx *reada);
>
> to trigger the readahead of parts of a tree. Multiple readahead
> requests can be given before waiting. This would enable the very
> beneficial folding seen above for 'reading both trees'.
>
> Also it would be possible to add a cascading readahead, where the
> content of leaves would trigger readaheads in other trees, maybe by
> giving a callback for the decisions what to read instead of the fixed
> start/end range.
>
> For the implementation I'd need an interface which I haven't been able
> to find yet. Currently I can trigger the read of several pages / tree
> blocks and wait for the completion of each of them. What I'd need would
> be an interface that gives me a callback on each completion or a waiting
> function that wakes up on each completion with the information which
> pages just completed.
> One way to achieve this would be to add a hook, but I gladly take any
> implementation hints.
We have the bio endio call backs for this, I think that's the only thing
you can use.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-23 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-23 13:06 [RFC] Tree fragmentation and prefetching Arne Jansen
2011-03-23 15:01 ` Arne Jansen
2011-03-23 19:26 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2011-03-23 20:28 ` Arne Jansen
2011-03-23 21:47 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2011-03-24 1:38 ` Miao Xie
2011-03-24 7:29 ` Arne Jansen
2011-03-24 12:45 ` Miao Xie
2011-03-23 19:32 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2011-03-25 20:14 ` Arne Jansen
2011-03-25 20:15 ` Chris Mason
2011-03-25 20:53 ` Arne Jansen
2011-03-25 21:01 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1300908672-sup-9552@think \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sensille@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).