linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Cc: Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Tree fragmentation and prefetching
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:32:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300908672-sup-9552@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D89F03A.9050306@gmx.net>

Excerpts from Arne Jansen's message of 2011-03-23 09:06:02 -0400:
> While looking into the performance of scrub I noticed that a significant
> amount of time is being used for loading the extent tree and the csum
> tree. While this is no surprise I did some prototyping on how to improve
> on it.
> The main idea is to load the tree (or parts of it) top-down, order the
> needed blocks and distribute it over all disks.
> To keep you interested, some results first.
> 
> a) by tree enumeration with reada=2
>    reading extent tree: 242s
>    reading csum tree: 140s
>    reading both trees: 324s
> 
> b) prefetch prototype
>    reading extent tree: 23.5s
>    reading csum tree: 20.4s
>    reading both trees: 25.7s

Very nice, btrfsck does something similar.

> 
> The test setup consists of a 7 Seagate ES.2 1TB disks filesystem, filled
> 28%. It is created with the current git tree + the round robin patch and
> filled with
> 
> fs_mark -D 512 -t 16 -n 4096 -F -S0
> 
> The 'normal' read is done by enumerating the leaves by btrfs_next_leaf()
> with path->reada=2. Both trees are being enumerated one after the other.
> The prototype currently just uses raw bios, does not make use of the
> page cache and does not enter the read pages into the cache. This will
> probably add some overhead. It also does not check the crcs.
> 
> While it is very promising to implement it for scrub, I think a more
> general interface which can be used for every enumeration would be
> beneficial. Use cases that come to mind are rebalance, reflink, deletion
> of large files, listing of large directories etc..
> 
> I'd imagine an interface along the lines of
> 
> int btrfs_readahead_init(struct btrfs_reada_ctx *reada);
> int btrfs_readahead_add(struct btrfs_root *root,
>                         struct btrfs_key *start,
>                         struct btrfs_key *end,
>                         struct btrfs_reada_ctx *reada);
> void btrfs_readahead_wait(struct btrfs_reada_ctx *reada);
> 
> to trigger the readahead of parts of a tree. Multiple readahead
> requests can be given before waiting. This would enable the very
> beneficial folding seen above for 'reading both trees'.
> 
> Also it would be possible to add a cascading readahead, where the
> content of leaves would trigger readaheads in other trees, maybe by
> giving a callback for the decisions what to read instead of the fixed
> start/end range.
> 
> For the implementation I'd need an interface which I haven't been able
> to find yet. Currently I can trigger the read of several pages / tree
> blocks and wait for the completion of each of them. What I'd need would
> be an interface that gives me a callback on each completion or a waiting
> function that wakes up on each completion with the information which
> pages just completed.
> One way to achieve this would be to add a hook, but I gladly take any
> implementation hints.

We have the bio endio call backs for this, I think that's the only thing
you can use.

-chris

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-23 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-23 13:06 [RFC] Tree fragmentation and prefetching Arne Jansen
2011-03-23 15:01 ` Arne Jansen
2011-03-23 19:26 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2011-03-23 20:28   ` Arne Jansen
2011-03-23 21:47     ` Andrey Kuzmin
2011-03-24  1:38     ` Miao Xie
2011-03-24  7:29       ` Arne Jansen
2011-03-24 12:45         ` Miao Xie
2011-03-23 19:32 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2011-03-25 20:14   ` Arne Jansen
2011-03-25 20:15     ` Chris Mason
2011-03-25 20:53       ` Arne Jansen
2011-03-25 21:01         ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1300908672-sup-9552@think \
    --to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sensille@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).