From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Schroeder <prq@safe-mail.net>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to know whether disks "handle flush requests correctly"
Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 09:48:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304688928-sup-8382@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DC3F33F.80309@redhat.com>
Excerpts from Josef Bacik's message of 2011-05-06 09:10:23 -0400:
> On 05/06/2011 05:13 AM, Paul Schroeder wrote:
> > The btrfs wiki Main Page warns that "it is currently possible to corrupt
> > a filesystem irrecoverably if your machine crashes or loses power on disks
> > that don't handle flush requests correctly."
> >
> > How do you know if this applies to your drives? Is there a way to test it,
> > or a model list, or are newer SATA drives (magnetic, not SSDs) always ok?
> > Does it depend on the controller? (I have a SiI 3114, latest BIOS.)
> >
> > I would also be using btrfs on top of dm-crypt (with the latest release
> > kernel). Some kernel versions ago, the message that write barriers aren't
> > supported disappeared; can I assume the device mapper / dm-crypt is not a
> > problem with regards to flushing?
> >
>
> Yeah if you don't see those messages you can be fairly certain you are
> ok. Thanks,
The easiest way to tell for sure is to do two tests:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/foo bs=4K count=10000
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/foo bs=4K count=10000 oflag=sync
Run this with the filesystem mounted normally and again with the
filesystem mounted -o nobarrier. -o nobarrier should be dramatically
and hugely faster, almost like we're not writing to the disk at all.
-chris
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-06 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-06 9:13 How to know whether disks "handle flush requests correctly" Paul Schroeder
2011-05-06 13:10 ` Josef Bacik
2011-05-06 13:48 ` Chris Mason [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1304688928-sup-8382@think \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prq@safe-mail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).