linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geoff Ritter <geoff.ritter@gmail.com>
To: C Anthony Risinger <anthony@xtfx.me>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: filesystem seeding ... BUGs on .38, .39, loopback, real devices, tmp branch ... everything
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 04:40:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307014855.13841.10.camel@quintos.origo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikZyg0gyUZH5pQ9d=P4brsTUA9PCg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 04:20 -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> 
> i tried with loop devices at first, then "real" devices -- this is all
> under KVM/QEMU, and with FSs that are/will be smaller than 1G.

I have tried the seed option as well.  I was able to successfully mount
the read write partition after setting up the seed.  However, both had
to be independent partitions on a real device.

During testing, both .38 and .39rc could NOT create a seed if one or
both partitions were encrypted.  I believe encrypted partitions also
work with a loop device for the unlocked version you write too.  The
response I got after a few days is as follows:

> Chris Mason chris.mason@oracle.com
> cwillu <cwillu@cwillu.com>
> date	Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:42 PM
> Ok, looks like I busted the seed support
> when I fixed up some of the chunk
> allocations.  I'll reproduce this and
> work out a fix.

I just assumed it would take a while to fix so I haven't tried again
since.  If the root of the problem appears to be loop devices, you might
want to report that.  Err I guess you did.  To me, this doesn't explain
why it wouldn't work in a Virtual Machine.  I would have thought the VM
would treat it as a real device.




  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-02 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-02  9:20 filesystem seeding ... BUGs on .38, .39, loopback, real devices, tmp branch ... everything C Anthony Risinger
2011-06-02 11:40 ` Geoff Ritter [this message]
2011-06-02 16:19   ` C Anthony Risinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1307014855.13841.10.camel@quintos.origo \
    --to=geoff.ritter@gmail.com \
    --cc=anthony@xtfx.me \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).