linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
To: Btrfs mailing list <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v8 3/8] btrfs: Factor out enumeration of chunks to a separate function
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:36:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309120615-18104-4-git-send-email-hugo@carfax.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309120615-18104-1-git-send-email-hugo@carfax.org.uk>

The main balance function has two loops which are functionally
identical in their looping mechanism, but which perform a different
operation on the chunks they loop over. To avoid repeating code more
than necessary, factor this loop out into a separate iterator function
which takes a function parameter for the action to be performed.

Signed-off-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c |  174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index f38b231..a81fd3c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -2014,6 +2014,97 @@ static u64 div_factor(u64 num, int factor)
 	return num;
 }
 
+/* Define a type, and two functions which can be used for the two
+ * phases of the balance operation: one for counting chunks, and one
+ * for actually moving them. */
+typedef void (*balance_iterator_function)(struct btrfs_root *,
+					  struct btrfs_balance_info *,
+					  struct btrfs_path *,
+					  struct btrfs_key *);
+
+static void balance_count_chunks(struct btrfs_root *chunk_root,
+			  struct btrfs_balance_info *bal_info,
+			  struct btrfs_path *path,
+			  struct btrfs_key *key)
+{
+	spin_lock(&chunk_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
+	bal_info->expected++;
+	spin_unlock(&chunk_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
+}
+
+static void balance_move_chunks(struct btrfs_root *chunk_root,
+			 struct btrfs_balance_info *bal_info,
+			 struct btrfs_path *path,
+			 struct btrfs_key *key)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = btrfs_relocate_chunk(chunk_root,
+				   chunk_root->root_key.objectid,
+				   key->objectid,
+				   key->offset);
+	BUG_ON(ret && ret != -ENOSPC);
+	spin_lock(&chunk_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
+	bal_info->completed++;
+	spin_unlock(&chunk_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
+	printk(KERN_INFO "btrfs: balance: %u/%u block groups completed\n",
+	       bal_info->completed, bal_info->expected);
+}
+
+/* Iterate through all chunks, performing some function on each one. */
+static int balance_iterate_chunks(struct btrfs_root *chunk_root,
+			   struct btrfs_balance_info *bal_info,
+			   balance_iterator_function iterator_fn)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	struct btrfs_path *path;
+	struct btrfs_key key;
+	struct btrfs_key found_key;
+
+	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
+	if (!path)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	key.objectid = BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID;
+	key.offset = (u64)-1;
+	key.type = BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY;
+
+	while (!bal_info->cancel_pending) {
+		ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, chunk_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			break;
+		/*
+		 * this shouldn't happen, it means the last relocate
+		 * failed
+		 */
+		if (ret == 0)
+			break;
+
+		ret = btrfs_previous_item(chunk_root, path, 0,
+					  BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+
+		btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &found_key,
+				      path->slots[0]);
+		if (found_key.objectid != key.objectid)
+			break;
+
+		/* chunk zero is special */
+		if (found_key.offset == 0)
+			break;
+
+		/* Call the function to do the work for this chunk */
+		btrfs_release_path(path);
+		iterator_fn(chunk_root, bal_info, path, &found_key);
+
+		key.offset = found_key.offset - 1;
+	}
+
+	btrfs_free_path(path);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -2021,11 +2112,8 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root)
 	struct btrfs_device *device;
 	u64 old_size;
 	u64 size_to_free;
-	struct btrfs_path *path;
-	struct btrfs_key key;
 	struct btrfs_root *chunk_root = dev_root->fs_info->chunk_root;
 	struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
-	struct btrfs_key found_key;
 	struct btrfs_balance_info *bal_info;
 
 	if (dev_root->fs_info->sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
@@ -2046,8 +2134,7 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root)
 	}
 	spin_lock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
 	dev_root->fs_info->balance_info = bal_info;
-	bal_info->expected = -1; /* One less than actually counted,
-				    because chunk 0 is special */
+	bal_info->expected = 0;
 	bal_info->completed = 0;
 	bal_info->cancel_pending = 0;
 	spin_unlock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
@@ -2076,86 +2163,23 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root)
 	}
 
 	/* step two, count the chunks */
-	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
-	if (!path) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
+	ret = balance_iterate_chunks(chunk_root, bal_info,
+				     balance_count_chunks);
+	if (ret)
 		goto error;
-	}
-
-	key.objectid = BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID;
-	key.offset = (u64)-1;
-	key.type = BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY;
-
-	ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, chunk_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
-	if (ret <= 0) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: Failed to find the last chunk.\n");
-		BUG();
-	}
-
-	while (1) {
-		ret = btrfs_previous_item(chunk_root, path, 0,
-					  BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY);
-		if (ret)
-			break;
-
-		spin_lock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
-		bal_info->expected++;
-		spin_unlock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
-	}
-
-	btrfs_release_path(path);
 
 	/* step three, relocate all the chunks */
-	key.objectid = BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID;
-	key.offset = (u64)-1;
-	key.type = BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY;
-
-	while (!bal_info->cancel_pending) {
-		ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, chunk_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			goto error;
-
-		/*
-		 * this shouldn't happen, it means the last relocate
-		 * failed
-		 */
-		if (ret == 0)
-			break;
-
-		ret = btrfs_previous_item(chunk_root, path, 0,
-					  BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY);
-		if (ret)
-			break;
-
-		btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &found_key,
-				      path->slots[0]);
-		if (found_key.objectid != key.objectid)
-			break;
-
-		/* chunk zero is special */
-		if (found_key.offset == 0)
-			break;
+	ret = balance_iterate_chunks(chunk_root, bal_info,
+				     balance_move_chunks);
+	if (ret)
+		goto error;
 
-		btrfs_release_path(path);
-		ret = btrfs_relocate_chunk(chunk_root,
-					   chunk_root->root_key.objectid,
-					   found_key.objectid,
-					   found_key.offset);
-		BUG_ON(ret && ret != -ENOSPC);
-		key.offset = found_key.offset - 1;
-		spin_lock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
-		bal_info->completed++;
-		spin_unlock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
-		printk(KERN_INFO "btrfs: balance: %u/%u block groups completed\n",
-		       bal_info->completed, bal_info->expected);
-	}
 	ret = 0;
 	if (bal_info->cancel_pending) {
 		printk(KERN_INFO "btrfs: balance cancelled\n");
 		ret = -EINTR;
 	}
 error:
-	btrfs_free_path(path);
 	spin_lock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
 	kfree(dev_root->fs_info->balance_info);
 	dev_root->fs_info->balance_info = NULL;
-- 
1.7.2.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-26 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-26 20:36 [PATCH v8 0/8] Balance management patches, v8 Hugo Mills
2011-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] btrfs: Balance progress monitoring Hugo Mills
2011-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] btrfs: Cancel filesystem balance Hugo Mills
2011-06-29  6:00   ` Li Zefan
2011-06-29 10:43     ` David Sterba
2011-06-26 20:36 ` Hugo Mills [this message]
2011-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] btrfs: Implement filtered balance ioctl Hugo Mills
2011-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] btrfs: Balance filter for device ID Hugo Mills
2011-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] btrfs: Balance filter for virtual address ranges Hugo Mills
2011-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] btrfs: Replication-type information Hugo Mills
2011-06-28 16:32   ` David Sterba
2011-06-28 19:26     ` Hugo Mills
2011-06-28 20:41       ` Ilya Dryomov
2011-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] btrfs: Balance filter for physical device address Hugo Mills

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1309120615-18104-4-git-send-email-hugo@carfax.org.uk \
    --to=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=dave@jikos.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).