From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Stephane Chazelas <stephane_chazelas@yahoo.fr>
Cc: cwillu <cwillu@cwillu.com>, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Memory leak?
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:15:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310141349-sup-9515@shiny> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110708154123.GA17886@yahoo.fr>
Excerpts from Stephane Chazelas's message of 2011-07-08 11:41:23 -0400:
> 2011-07-08 11:06:08 -0400, Chris Mason:
> [...]
> > So the invalidate opcode in btrfs-fixup-0 is the big problem. We're
> > either failing to write because we weren't able to allocate memory (and
> > not dealing with it properly) or there is a bigger problem.
> >
> > Does the btrfs-fixup-0 oops come before or after the ooms?
>
> Hi Chris, thanks for looking into this.
>
> It comes long before. Hours before there's any problem. So it
> seems unrelated.
It could be the cause of the problem. We're calling BUG() with the page
locked, which means that page will never ever be freed, and since this
worker thread is gone, it could be messing up various parts of the
reclaim code.
But, this worker thread isn't supposed to get called very often...it's
really catching a corner of a corner of a strange race. So we do need
to get a better understanding of why and how often.
You described this workload as rsync, is there anything else running?
I'd definitely try without -o compress_force.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-08 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-03 19:09 Memory leak? Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-03 19:38 ` cwillu
2011-07-06 8:11 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-07 8:09 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-07 8:20 ` Li Zefan
2011-07-07 8:37 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 12:44 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 15:06 ` Chris Mason
2011-07-08 15:41 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 16:11 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 16:17 ` Chris Mason
2011-07-08 16:57 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-09 17:11 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 16:15 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2011-07-08 17:06 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 20:04 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 20:12 ` Chris Mason
2011-07-09 7:09 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-09 7:42 ` A lot of writing to FS only read (Was: Memory leak?) Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-10 5:58 ` Memory leak? Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-09 17:09 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-09 19:25 ` cwillu
2011-07-09 20:36 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-10 12:44 ` Chris Mason
2011-07-10 18:37 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-11 9:01 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-11 15:00 ` Chris Mason
2011-07-11 15:35 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-11 16:25 ` Chris Mason
2011-07-11 16:34 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-12 11:40 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-16 12:12 ` write(2) taking 4s. (Was: Memory leak?) Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-16 16:22 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-17 9:17 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-18 10:39 ` write(2) taking 4s Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-18 19:37 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-19 9:32 ` Stephane Chazelas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1310141349-sup-9515@shiny \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=cwillu@cwillu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephane_chazelas@yahoo.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).