linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Cc: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: new metadata reader/writer locks in integration-test
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:53:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311295973-sup-3312@shiny> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E27BD4F.6020900@gmx.net>

Excerpts from Arne Jansen's message of 2011-07-21 01:46:55 -0400:
> On 21.07.2011 02:48, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
> > (2011/07/21 2:21), Chris Mason wrote:
> >> Excerpts from Chris Mason's message of 2011-07-19 13:30:22 -0400:
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I've pushed out a new integration-test branch, and it includes a new
> >>> reader/writer locking scheme for the btree locks.
> >>>
> >>> We've seen a number of benchmarks dominated by contention on the root
> >>> node lock.  This changes our locks into a simple reader/writer lock.
> >>> They are based on mutexes so that we still take advantage of the mutex
> >>> adaptive spins for write locks (rwsemaphores were much slower).
> >>>
> >>> I'm also sending the individual commits, please do take a look.
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I just rebased Josef's enospc fixes into integration-test, it should fix
> >> the warnings in extent-tree.c
> >>
> > 
> > Unfortunately, I got the following messages.
> > 
> > 
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5564 btrfs_alloc_reserved_file_extent+0xf8/0x100 [btrfs]()
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: Hardware name: PRIMERGY
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate crc32c libcrc32c autofs4 sunrpc 8021q garp stp llc cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf ipv6 ext3 jbd dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod kvm uinput ppdev parport_pc parport sg pcspkr i2c_i801 i2c_core iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support tg3 shpchp pci_hotplug i3000_edac edac_core ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 sd_mod crc_t10dif sr_mod cdrom megaraid_sas floppy pata_acpi ata_generic ata_piix libata scsi_mod [last unloaded: microcode]
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: Pid: 5517, comm: btrfs-endio-wri Tainted: G        W   2.6.39btrfs-tc1+ #1
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: Call Trace:
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffff8106004f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffff810600aa>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffffa044a068>] btrfs_alloc_reserved_file_extent+0xf8/0x100 [btrfs]
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffffa0464121>] insert_reserved_file_extent.clone.0+0x201/0x270 [btrfs]
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffffa0468c0b>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x2eb/0x360 [btrfs]
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffff8106fe23>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x83/0xe0
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffffa0468cd0>] btrfs_writepage_end_io_hook+0x50/0xa0 [btrfs]
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffffa049a3c6>] end_compressed_bio_write+0x86/0xf0 [btrfs]
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffff8117f96d>] bio_endio+0x1d/0x40
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffffa0459d84>] end_workqueue_fn+0xf4/0x130 [btrfs]
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffffa048841e>] worker_loop+0x13e/0x540 [btrfs]
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffffa04882e0>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x2d0/0x2d0 [btrfs]
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffffa04882e0>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x2d0/0x2d0 [btrfs]
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffff81081756>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffff81486004>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffff810816c0>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x1a0/0x1a0
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: [<ffffffff81486000>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> > Jul 21 09:41:22 luna kernel: ---[ end trace 02c1fa3044677043 ]---
> > 
> 
> a very similar warning here, but without compression involved:

Ok, these are probably the enospc fixes.  Could you please try bisecting
out some of Josef's patches?

-chris

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-22  0:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-19 17:30 new metadata reader/writer locks in integration-test Chris Mason
2011-07-20  2:08 ` Tsutomu Itoh
2011-07-20  7:58   ` Chris Mason
2011-07-20  8:36     ` Tsutomu Itoh
2011-07-22 15:49       ` Chris Mason
2011-07-20  6:55 ` Arne Jansen
2011-07-20 16:49   ` Arne Jansen
2011-07-20 17:21 ` Chris Mason
2011-07-20 18:51   ` Chris Mason
2011-07-21  4:54     ` Li Zefan
2011-07-21  0:48   ` Tsutomu Itoh
2011-07-21  5:46     ` Arne Jansen
2011-07-22  0:53       ` Chris Mason [this message]
2011-07-22  4:06         ` Miao Xie
2011-07-22  9:12           ` Miao Xie
2011-07-21  5:44   ` Arne Jansen
2011-07-22 15:58     ` Arne Jansen
2011-07-22 15:01 ` rw_semaphore performance, was: " Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-22 15:14   ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1311295973-sup-3312@shiny \
    --to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sensille@gmx.net \
    --cc=t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).