From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: processes stuck in llseek Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:00:27 -0400 Message-ID: <1313683211-sup-3134@shiny> References: <1313499055-sup-2296@shiny> <4E4B181E.8000508@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Li Zefan , Dan Merillat , Linux Kernel Mailing List , BTRFS Mailing list To: Mitch Harder Return-path: In-reply-to: List-ID: Excerpts from Mitch Harder's message of 2011-08-18 11:40:17 -0400: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Li Zefan wrote= : > > Dan Merillat wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Chris Mason wrote: > >>> Excerpts from Dan Merillat's message of 2011-08-15 23:59:50 -0400= : > >> > >>> Dan Carpenter sent a patch for this, I'll get it queued up for rc= 3. > >> > >> Can you send it? =C2=A0I'd like to test it to see if it fixes my s= ystem. > > > > Here it is. > > > > http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-btrfs&m=3D131176036219732&w=3D2 > > >=20 > Doesn't this patch rely on Josef's SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA patch set whic= h > isn't in the kernel yet? >=20 > http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-btrfs&m=3D130927580606177&w=3D2 It does, but the hang was reported on 3.1-rc1, which does have Josef's code. -chris