* btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition - missing patch in stable?
@ 2026-03-04 13:54 torvic9
2026-03-04 14:15 ` Sun YangKai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: torvic9 @ 2026-03-04 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sunk67188@gmail.com, clm@meta.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
dsterba@suse.com
Hello,
Commit "btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition" (25ecb24405928d3f5db48029c2237b2c7cefb479) was added to stable,
however it seems that a subsequent locking fix [1] to that patch was not added, possibly due to a missing stable tag.
Shouldn't that fix also be included in stable?
Cheers,
Tor
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20260209130248.29418-1-sunk67188@gmail.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition - missing patch in stable?
2026-03-04 13:54 btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition - missing patch in stable? torvic9
@ 2026-03-04 14:15 ` Sun YangKai
2026-03-05 2:27 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sun YangKai @ 2026-03-04 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: torvic9, clm@meta.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
dsterba@suse.com
On 2026/3/4 21:54, torvic9@mailbox.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Commit "btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition" (25ecb24405928d3f5db48029c2237b2c7cefb479) was added to stable,
> however it seems that a subsequent locking fix [1] to that patch was not added, possibly due to a missing stable tag.
> Shouldn't that fix also be included in stable?
Yes, I think that fix should also be included in stable.
Thanks,
Sun YangKai
> Cheers,
> Tor
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20260209130248.29418-1-sunk67188@gmail.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition - missing patch in stable?
2026-03-04 14:15 ` Sun YangKai
@ 2026-03-05 2:27 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2026-03-05 2:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sun YangKai
Cc: torvic9, clm@meta.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
dsterba@suse.com
On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 10:15:43PM +0800, Sun YangKai wrote:
>
>
> On 2026/3/4 21:54, torvic9@mailbox.org wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Commit "btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition" (25ecb24405928d3f5db48029c2237b2c7cefb479) was added to stable,
> > however it seems that a subsequent locking fix [1] to that patch was not added, possibly due to a missing stable tag.
> > Shouldn't that fix also be included in stable?
>
> Yes, I think that fix should also be included in stable.
The patch is is the queue for -rc4 (or maybe rc3).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-05 2:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-04 13:54 btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition - missing patch in stable? torvic9
2026-03-04 14:15 ` Sun YangKai
2026-03-05 2:27 ` David Sterba
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox