From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-101.mailbox.org (mout-p-101.mailbox.org [80.241.56.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52DED396596 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2026 13:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.151 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772632457; cv=none; b=XiiqIdI/LJkrIWoNO2ltscF1mkaFW8B1LkO9WejCVWtu70MFQh1YVbQ8mEZiQMJ2BieLvf8bPR9rJQzjZllF/k3TRKu/GCUa6vfK17iIOOPT1/KoRttXDzPFAaquA+eGrhwHtoN6aIkuON24Exa5u79om/sfPKnRFp+7SIHSHUs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772632457; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xvdRkZj57oc8RHWeWgbR6cK30VjNYlk6ZDbpmNzXzBY=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=n7JXxmkLsHKITGA+oPj5Xcky2M5/9WHsPBYr2XDMWO3rjdaGud1YMlm3h0zCVafPMVxDRtHmoWkj9AAs+BOr9ECR9JivbCtAuC4vkZFrN+grUXsgbyLqmYAjc39TFF2EGhLitp4YTylNpmW8y9uoSeR9NkX4tArsgyU2i3KDA/U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=KYmys5yj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.151 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="KYmys5yj" Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [10.196.197.102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-101.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fQvKb0F7Wz9tB3; Wed, 4 Mar 2026 14:54:11 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1772632451; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xvdRkZj57oc8RHWeWgbR6cK30VjNYlk6ZDbpmNzXzBY=; b=KYmys5yjHTYJUpVPB+5m89JkyHwVhZ4IW+TtY/gdEnr9+KVc9sFLAD7KTQn1SJ0olIm/HG QzUoBEzC85dcLrwllnilgXJ0d7L6feAHrPhHf69Y/BTdZJG8VwdOz7+dEsyivjA5oPDnjj SMx7UKj7PJW4mgl0AT7/Cmsc3cX88VqUW66NPoopxN2A7DJfUMrkdNaTwYNKkWrRqcHCsO cNdrVBMdveU2/eDR0P3AhHq2LOhJLs0125XXiDrCn80SlsGLnG6Gs0hzmXKcZNN69DIDGk 0R9shRkcwcpu2KhV7q6GFoIUgJlGYlAmjdlYpEs8AaCWBWucMt8el/1r7DxA0w== Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 14:54:08 +0100 (CET) From: torvic9@mailbox.org To: "sunk67188@gmail.com" , "clm@meta.com" , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" , "dsterba@suse.com" Message-ID: <1333479338.178488.1772632448830@app.mailbox.org> Subject: btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition - missing patch in stable? Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MBO-RS-META: ubz6gzxth61czkmji3gfu5hqgwy7nba7 X-MBO-RS-ID: c53b355a4e8d3d92018 Hello, Commit "btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition" (25ecb24405928d3f5db48029c2237b2c7cefb479) was added to stable, however it seems that a subsequent locking fix [1] to that patch was not added, possibly due to a missing stable tag. Shouldn't that fix also be included in stable? Cheers, Tor [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20260209130248.29418-1-sunk67188@gmail.com/