[PATCH] Btrfs: don't return true in releasepage unless we actually freed the eb

[Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>]

I noticed while looking at an extent_buffer race that we will
unconditionally return 1 if we get down to release_extent_buffer after
clearing the tree ref.  However we can easily race in here and get a ref on
the eb and not actually free the eb.  So make release_extent_buffer return 1
if it free'd the eb and 0 if not so we can be a little kinder to the vm.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c |    9 +++++----
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 7926e1e..b778fc2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -4319,7 +4319,7 @@ static inline void btrfs_release_extent_buffer_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
 }
 
 /* Expects to have eb->eb_lock already held */
-static void release_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb, gfp_t mask)
+static int release_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb, gfp_t mask)
 {
 	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->refs) == 0);
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->refs)) {
@@ -4340,9 +4340,11 @@ static void release_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb, gfp_t mask)
 		btrfs_release_extent_buffer_page(eb, 0);
 
 		call_rcu(&eb->rcu_head, btrfs_release_extent_buffer_rcu);
-		return;
+		return 1;
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&eb->refs_lock);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 void free_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb)
@@ -4981,7 +4983,6 @@ int try_release_extent_buffer(struct page *page, gfp_t mask)
 		spin_unlock(&eb->refs_lock);
 		return 0;
 	}
-	release_extent_buffer(eb, mask);
 
-	return 1;
+	return release_extent_buffer(eb, mask);
 }
-- 
1.7.7.6