[PATCH] Btrfs: merge inode_list in __merge_refs

[Alexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>]

When __merge_refs merges two refs, it is also needed to merge the
inode_list of both refs. Otherwise we have missed backrefs and memory
leaks. This happens for example if two inodes share an extent and
both lie in the same leaf and thus also have the same parent.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
---
 fs/btrfs/backref.c |   13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index 208d8aa..aea6d2d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ static int __merge_refs(struct list_head *head, int mode)
 		     pos2 = n2, n2 = pos2->next) {
 			struct __prelim_ref *ref2;
 			struct __prelim_ref *xchg;
+			struct extent_inode_elem *eie;
 
 			ref2 = list_entry(pos2, struct __prelim_ref, list);
 
@@ -472,12 +473,20 @@ static int __merge_refs(struct list_head *head, int mode)
 					ref1 = ref2;
 					ref2 = xchg;
 				}
-				ref1->count += ref2->count;
 			} else {
 				if (ref1->parent != ref2->parent)
 					continue;
-				ref1->count += ref2->count;
 			}
+
+			eie = ref1->inode_list;
+			while (eie && eie->next)
+				eie = eie->next;
+			if (eie)
+				eie->next = ref2->inode_list;
+			else
+				ref1->inode_list = ref2->inode_list;
+			ref1->count += ref2->count;
+
 			list_del(&ref2->list);
 			kfree(ref2);
 		}
-- 
1.7.10.4