From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: enhance superblock checks
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:15:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362748538-12873-1-git-send-email-dsterba@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362585400-13379-1-git-send-email-dsterba@suse.cz>
The superblock checksum is not verified upon mount. <awkward silence>
Add that check and also reorder existing checks to a more logical
order.
Current mkfs.btrfs does not calculate the correct checksum of
super_block and thus a freshly created filesytem will fail to mount when
this patch is applied.
First transaction commit calculates correct superblock checksum and
saves it to disk.
Reproducer:
$ mfks.btrfs /dev/sda
$ mount /dev/sda /mnt
$ btrfs scrub start /mnt
$ sleep 5
$ btrfs scrub status /mnt
... super:2 ...
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
---
v1->v2:
- updated reproducer with sleep 5
- convert check_super_csum to one return point
- remove BUG_ON from btrfs_super_csum_size
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 6 ++-
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index e91959a..a4d572a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -2774,8 +2774,10 @@ BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(super_cache_generation, struct btrfs_super_block,
static inline int btrfs_super_csum_size(struct btrfs_super_block *s)
{
- int t = btrfs_super_csum_type(s);
- BUG_ON(t >= ARRAY_SIZE(btrfs_csum_sizes));
+ u16 t = btrfs_super_csum_type(s);
+ /*
+ * csum type is validated at mount time
+ */
return btrfs_csum_sizes[t];
}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 7d4dcb6..c52f52b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -354,6 +354,44 @@ out:
}
/*
+ * Return 0 if the superblock checksum type matches the checksum value of that
+ * algorithm. Pass the raw disk superblock data.
+ */
+static int btrfs_check_super_csum(char *raw_disk_sb)
+{
+ struct btrfs_super_block *disk_sb =
+ (struct btrfs_super_block *)raw_disk_sb;
+ u16 csum_type = btrfs_super_csum_type(disk_sb);
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (csum_type == BTRFS_CSUM_TYPE_CRC32) {
+ const int csum_size = btrfs_csum_sizes[csum_type];
+ u32 crc = ~(u32)0;
+ char result[csum_size];
+
+ /*
+ * The super_block structure does not span the whole
+ * BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE range, we expect that the unused space
+ * is filled with zeros and is included in the checkum.
+ */
+ crc = btrfs_csum_data(NULL, raw_disk_sb + BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE,
+ crc, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE - BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE);
+ btrfs_csum_final(crc, result);
+
+ if (memcmp(raw_disk_sb, result, csum_size))
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+
+ if (csum_type >= ARRAY_SIZE(btrfs_csum_sizes)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: unsupported checksum algorithm %u\n",
+ csum_type);
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
* helper to read a given tree block, doing retries as required when
* the checksums don't match and we have alternate mirrors to try.
*/
@@ -2205,12 +2243,31 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
fs_info, BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_OBJECTID);
invalidate_bdev(fs_devices->latest_bdev);
+
+ /*
+ * Read super block and check the signature bytes only
+ */
bh = btrfs_read_dev_super(fs_devices->latest_bdev);
if (!bh) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto fail_alloc;
}
+ /*
+ * We want to check superblock checksum, the type is stored inside.
+ * Pass the whole disk block of size BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE (4k).
+ */
+ if (btrfs_check_super_csum(bh->b_data)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: superblock checksum mismatch\n");
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto fail_alloc;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * super_copy is zeroed at allocation time and we never touch the
+ * following bytes up to INFO_SIZE, the checksum is calculated from
+ * the whole block of INFO_SIZE
+ */
memcpy(fs_info->super_copy, bh->b_data, sizeof(*fs_info->super_copy));
memcpy(fs_info->super_for_commit, fs_info->super_copy,
sizeof(*fs_info->super_for_commit));
@@ -2218,6 +2275,13 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
memcpy(fs_info->fsid, fs_info->super_copy->fsid, BTRFS_FSID_SIZE);
+ ret = btrfs_check_super_valid(fs_info, sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY);
+ if (ret) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: superblock contains fatal errors\n");
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto fail_alloc;
+ }
+
disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
if (!btrfs_super_root(disk_super))
goto fail_alloc;
@@ -2226,13 +2290,6 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
if (btrfs_super_flags(disk_super) & BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_ERROR)
set_bit(BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR, &fs_info->fs_state);
- ret = btrfs_check_super_valid(fs_info, sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY);
- if (ret) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: superblock contains fatal errors\n");
- err = ret;
- goto fail_alloc;
- }
-
/*
* run through our array of backup supers and setup
* our ring pointer to the oldest one
@@ -3564,14 +3621,9 @@ int btrfs_read_buffer(struct extent_buffer *buf, u64 parent_transid)
static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
int read_only)
{
- if (btrfs_super_csum_type(fs_info->super_copy) >= ARRAY_SIZE(btrfs_csum_sizes)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: unsupported checksum algorithm\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- if (read_only)
- return 0;
-
+ /*
+ * Placeholder for checks
+ */
return 0;
}
--
1.7.9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-08 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-06 15:56 [PATCH] btrfs: enhance superblock checks David Sterba
2013-03-06 16:32 ` [PATCH] btrfs-progs: separate super_copy out of fs_info David Sterba
2013-03-06 17:14 ` [PATCH] btrfs: enhance superblock checks Blair Zajac
2013-03-06 18:33 ` David Sterba
2013-03-06 18:56 ` Zach Brown
2013-03-07 14:52 ` David Sterba
2013-03-07 17:00 ` Zach Brown
2013-03-07 9:42 ` David Sterba
2013-03-08 13:15 ` David Sterba [this message]
2013-03-13 19:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Mason
2013-03-15 11:22 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1362748538-12873-1-git-send-email-dsterba@suse.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).