From: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>,
Gabriel de Perthuis <g2p.code@gmail.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>, Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] btrfs: offline dedupe v3
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:30:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374856212-11228-1-git-send-email-mfasheh@suse.de> (raw)
Hi,
The following series of patches implements in btrfs an ioctl to do
offline deduplication of file extents.
To be clear, "offline" in this sense means that the file system is
mounted and running, but the dedupe is not done during file writes,
but after the fact when some userspace software initiates a dedupe.
The primary patch is loosely based off of one sent by Josef Bacik back
in January, 2011.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/8508
I've made significant updates and changes from the original. In
particular the structure passed is more fleshed out, this series has a
high degree of code sharing between itself and the clone code, and the
locking has been updated.
The ioctl accepts a struct:
struct btrfs_ioctl_same_args {
__u64 logical_offset; /* in - start of extent in source */
__u64 length; /* in - length of extent */
__u16 dest_count; /* in - total elements in info array */
__u16 reserved1;
__u32 reserved2;
struct btrfs_ioctl_same_extent_info info[0];
};
Userspace puts each duplicate extent (other than the source) in an
item in the info array. As there can be multiple dedupes in one
operation, each info item has it's own status and 'bytes_deduped'
member. This provides a number of benefits:
- We don't have to fail the entire ioctl because one of the dedupes failed.
- Userspace will always know how much progress was made on a file as we always
return the number of bytes deduped.
#define BTRFS_SAME_DATA_DIFFERS 1
/* For extent-same ioctl */
struct btrfs_ioctl_same_extent_info {
__s64 fd; /* in - destination file */
__u64 logical_offset; /* in - start of extent in destination */
__u64 bytes_deduped; /* out - total # of bytes we were able
* to dedupe from this file */
/* status of this dedupe operation:
* 0 if dedup succeeds
* < 0 for error
* == BTRFS_SAME_DATA_DIFFERS if data differs
*/
__s32 status; /* out - see above description */
__u32 reserved;
};
The kernel patches are based off Linux v3.9. At this point I've tested the
ioctl against a decent variety of files and conditions.
A git tree for the kernel changes can be found at:
https://github.com/markfasheh/btrfs-extent-same
I have a userspace project, duperemove available at:
https://github.com/markfasheh/duperemove
Hopefully this can serve as an example of one possible usage of the ioctl.
duperemove takes a list of files as argument and will search them for
duplicated extents. If given the '-D' switch, duperemove will send dedupe
requests for same extents and display the results.
Within the duperemove repo is a file, btrfs-extent-same.c that acts as
a test wrapper around the ioctl. It can be compiled completely
seperately from the rest of the project via "make
btrfs-extent-same". This makes direct testing of the ioctl more
convenient.
Gabriel de Perthuis also has a bedup branch which works against this ioctl.
The branch can be found at:
https://github.com/g2p/bedup/tree/wip/dedup-syscall
Limitations
We can't yet dedupe within the same file (that is, source and destination
are the same inode). This is due to a limitation in btrfs_clone().
Code review is very much appreciated. Thanks,
--Mark
ChangeLog
- allow root to always dedupe
- call flush_dcach_page() before we memcmp user data (thanks to Zach Brown
<zab@redhat.com> for review)
- make sure we can't get a symlink passed in as one of our arguments (thanks
to Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> for review)
- we don't read into buffers any more and compare page by page (thanks to
Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> for review)
- rework btrfs_double_lock() a bit to use swap() (thanks to Zach Brown
<zab@redhat.com> for review)
Changes from v1 to v2
- check that we have appropriate access to each file before deduping. For
the source, we only check that it is opened for read. Target files have to
be open for write.
- don't dedupe on readonly submounts (this is to maintain
- check that we don't dedupe files with different checksumming states
(compare BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM flags)
- get and maintain write access to the mount during the extent same
operation (mount_want_write())
- allocate our read buffers up front in btrfs_ioctl_file_extent_same() and
pass them through for re-use on every call to btrfs_extent_same(). (thanks
to David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> for reporting this
- As the read buffers could possibly be up to 1MB (depending on user
request), we now conditionally vmalloc them.
- removed redundant check for same inode. btrfs_extent_same() catches it now
and bubbles the error up.
- remove some unnecessary printks
Changes from RFC to v1:
- don't error on large length value in btrfs exent-same, instead we just
dedupe the maximum allowed. That way userspace doesn't have to worry
about an arbitrary length limit.
- btrfs_extent_same will now loop over the dedupe range at 1MB increments (for
a total of 16MB per request)
- cleaned up poorly coded while loop in __extent_read_full_page() (thanks to
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> for reporting this)
- included two fixes from Gabriel de Perthuis <g2p.code@gmail.com>:
- allow dedupe across subvolumes
- don't lock compressed pages twice when deduplicating
- removed some unused / poorly designed fields in btrfs_ioctl_same_args.
This should also give us a bit more reserved bytes.
- return -E2BIG instead of -ENOMEM when arg list is too large (thanks to
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> for reporting this)
- Some more reserved bytes are now included as a result of some of my
cleanups. Quite possibly we could add a couple more.
next reply other threads:[~2013-07-26 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 16:30 Mark Fasheh [this message]
2013-07-26 16:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] btrfs: abtract out range locking in clone ioctl() Mark Fasheh
2013-07-26 16:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] btrfs_ioctl_clone: Move clone code into it's own function Mark Fasheh
2013-07-26 16:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] btrfs: Introduce extent_read_full_page_nolock() Mark Fasheh
2013-07-26 16:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] btrfs: offline dedupe Mark Fasheh
2013-07-26 22:09 ` Zach Brown
2013-07-26 16:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] btrfs: offline dedupe v3 Ric Wheeler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1374856212-11228-1-git-send-email-mfasheh@suse.de \
--to=mfasheh@suse.de \
--cc=chris.mason@fusionio.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=g2p.code@gmail.com \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).