From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] btrfs: Use btrfs_workqueue_struct to replace the fs_info->workers
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:52:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1378889558-21514-6-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378889558-21514-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Use the newly created btrfs_workqueue_struct to replace the original
fs_info->workers
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 36 +++++++++++++++---------------------
fs/btrfs/super.c | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 0dd6ec9..2662ef2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -1477,10 +1477,10 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
* two
*/
struct btrfs_workers generic_worker;
- struct btrfs_workers workers;
struct btrfs_workers delalloc_workers;
struct btrfs_workers submit_workers;
+ struct btrfs_workqueue_struct *workers;
struct workqueue_struct *flush_workers;
struct workqueue_struct *endio_workers;
struct workqueue_struct *endio_meta_workers;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 0f44828..fb9b760 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
#include "rcu-string.h"
#include "dev-replace.h"
#include "raid56.h"
+#include "bwq.h"
#ifdef CONFIG_X86
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
@@ -108,7 +109,7 @@ struct async_submit_bio {
* can't tell us where in the file the bio should go
*/
u64 bio_offset;
- struct btrfs_work work;
+ struct btrfs_work_struct work;
int error;
};
@@ -751,12 +752,12 @@ int btrfs_bio_wq_end_io(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, struct bio *bio,
unsigned long btrfs_async_submit_limit(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
{
unsigned long limit = min_t(unsigned long,
- info->workers.max_workers,
+ info->thread_pool_size,
info->fs_devices->open_devices);
return 256 * limit;
}
-static void run_one_async_start(struct btrfs_work *work)
+static void run_one_async_start(struct btrfs_work_struct *work)
{
struct async_submit_bio *async;
int ret;
@@ -769,7 +770,7 @@ static void run_one_async_start(struct btrfs_work *work)
async->error = ret;
}
-static void run_one_async_done(struct btrfs_work *work)
+static void run_one_async_done(struct btrfs_work_struct *work)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
struct async_submit_bio *async;
@@ -796,7 +797,7 @@ static void run_one_async_done(struct btrfs_work *work)
async->bio_offset);
}
-static void run_one_async_free(struct btrfs_work *work)
+static void run_one_async_free(struct btrfs_work_struct *work)
{
struct async_submit_bio *async;
@@ -824,11 +825,9 @@ int btrfs_wq_submit_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct inode *inode,
async->submit_bio_start = submit_bio_start;
async->submit_bio_done = submit_bio_done;
- async->work.func = run_one_async_start;
- async->work.ordered_func = run_one_async_done;
- async->work.ordered_free = run_one_async_free;
+ btrfs_init_work(&async->work, run_one_async_start,
+ run_one_async_done, run_one_async_free);
- async->work.flags = 0;
async->bio_flags = bio_flags;
async->bio_offset = bio_offset;
@@ -837,9 +836,9 @@ int btrfs_wq_submit_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct inode *inode,
atomic_inc(&fs_info->nr_async_submits);
if (rw & REQ_SYNC)
- btrfs_set_work_high_prio(&async->work);
+ btrfs_set_work_high_priority(&async->work);
- btrfs_queue_worker(&fs_info->workers, &async->work);
+ btrfs_queue_work(fs_info->workers, &async->work);
while (atomic_read(&fs_info->async_submit_draining) &&
atomic_read(&fs_info->nr_async_submits)) {
@@ -1987,7 +1986,7 @@ static void btrfs_stop_all_workers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{
btrfs_stop_workers(&fs_info->generic_worker);
btrfs_stop_workers(&fs_info->delalloc_workers);
- btrfs_stop_workers(&fs_info->workers);
+ btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->workers);
btrfs_stop_workers(&fs_info->submit_workers);
destroy_workqueue(fs_info->fixup_workers);
destroy_workqueue(fs_info->endio_workers);
@@ -2462,9 +2461,8 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
btrfs_init_workers(&fs_info->generic_worker,
"genwork", 1, NULL);
- btrfs_init_workers(&fs_info->workers, "worker",
- fs_info->thread_pool_size,
- &fs_info->generic_worker);
+ fs_info->workers = btrfs_alloc_workqueue("worker", "worker-ordered",
+ "worker-high", max_active);
btrfs_init_workers(&fs_info->delalloc_workers, "delalloc",
fs_info->thread_pool_size,
@@ -2478,9 +2476,6 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
&fs_info->generic_worker);
fs_info->caching_workers = alloc_workqueue("cache", flags, 2);
- fs_info->workers.idle_thresh = 16;
- fs_info->workers.ordered = 1;
-
fs_info->delalloc_workers.idle_thresh = 2;
fs_info->delalloc_workers.ordered = 1;
@@ -2507,13 +2502,12 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
* btrfs_start_workers can really only fail because of ENOMEM so just
* return -ENOMEM if any of these fail.
*/
- ret = btrfs_start_workers(&fs_info->workers);
- ret |= btrfs_start_workers(&fs_info->generic_worker);
+ ret = btrfs_start_workers(&fs_info->generic_worker);
ret |= btrfs_start_workers(&fs_info->delalloc_workers);
ret |= btrfs_start_workers(&fs_info->submit_workers);
if (ret || !(fs_info->flush_workers && fs_info->endio_workers &&
- fs_info->endio_meta_workers &&
+ fs_info->endio_meta_workers && fs_info->workers &&
fs_info->endio_raid56_workers &&
fs_info->rmw_workers &&
fs_info->endio_meta_write_workers &&
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index f557ab6..8fe41f9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
#include "rcu-string.h"
#include "dev-replace.h"
#include "free-space-cache.h"
+#include "bwq.h"
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/btrfs.h>
@@ -1174,7 +1175,7 @@ static void btrfs_resize_thread_pool(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
old_pool_size, new_pool_size);
btrfs_set_max_workers(&fs_info->generic_worker, new_pool_size);
- btrfs_set_max_workers(&fs_info->workers, new_pool_size);
+ btrfs_workqueue_set_max(fs_info->workers, new_pool_size);
btrfs_set_max_workers(&fs_info->delalloc_workers, new_pool_size);
btrfs_set_max_workers(&fs_info->submit_workers, new_pool_size);
workqueue_set_max_active(fs_info->caching_workers, new_pool_size);
--
1.8.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-11 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-11 8:52 [PATCH 0/9] btrfs: Replace the btrfs_workers with kernel workqueue Qu Wenruo
2013-09-11 8:52 ` [PATCH 1/9] btrfs: Cleanup the unused struct async_sched Qu Wenruo
2013-09-11 8:52 ` [PATCH 2/9] btrfs: use kernel workqueue to replace the btrfs_workers functions Qu Wenruo
2013-09-11 13:02 ` Stefan Behrens
2013-09-12 0:56 ` Qu Wenruo
2013-09-11 8:52 ` [PATCH 3/9] btrfs: Added btrfs_workqueue_struct implemented ordered execution based on kernel workqueue Qu Wenruo
2013-09-11 8:52 ` [PATCH 4/9] btrfs: Add high priority workqueue support for btrfs_workqueue_struct Qu Wenruo
2013-09-11 8:52 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2013-09-11 8:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] btrfs: Use btrfs_workqueue_struct to replace the fs_info->delalloc_workers Qu Wenruo
2013-09-11 8:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] btrfs: Replace the fs_info->submit_workers with kernel workqueue Qu Wenruo
2013-09-11 8:52 ` [PATCH 8/9] btrfs: Cleanup the old btrfs workqueue Qu Wenruo
2013-09-11 17:39 ` Zach Brown
2013-09-11 8:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] btrfs: Replace thread_pool_size with workqueue default value Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1378889558-21514-6-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).