From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <walken@google.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<mingo@kernel.org>, <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: stop caching thread if extent_commit_sem is contended
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:26:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380201996-17445-2-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380201996-17445-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com>
We can starve out the transaction commit with a bunch of caching threads all
running at the same time. This is because we will only drop the
extent_commit_sem if we need_resched(), which isn't likely to happen since we
will be reading a lot from the disk so have already schedule()'ed plenty. Alex
observed that he could starve out a transaction commit for up to a minute with
32 caching threads all running at once. This will allow us to drop the
extent_commit_sem to allow the transaction commit to swap the commit_root out
and then all the cachers will start back up. Here is an explanation provided by
Igno
So, just to fill in what happens in this loop:
mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
cond_resched();
goto again;
where 'again:' takes caching_ctl->mutex and fs_info->extent_commit_sem
again:
again:
mutex_lock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
/* need to make sure the commit_root doesn't disappear */
down_read(&fs_info->extent_commit_sem);
So, if I'm reading the code correct, there can be a fair amount of
concurrency here: there may be multiple 'caching kthreads' per filesystem
active, while there's one fs_info->extent_commit_sem per filesystem
AFAICS.
So, what happens if there are a lot of CPUs all busy holding the
->extent_commit_sem rwsem read-locked and a writer arrives? They'd all
rush to try to release the fs_info->extent_commit_sem, and they'd block in
the down_read() because there's a writer waiting.
So there's a guarantee of forward progress. This should answer akpm's
concern I think.
Thanks,
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index cfb3cf7..cc074c34 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -442,7 +442,8 @@ next:
if (ret)
break;
- if (need_resched()) {
+ if (need_resched() ||
+ rwsem_is_contended(&fs_info->extent_commit_sem)) {
caching_ctl->progress = last;
btrfs_release_path(path);
up_read(&fs_info->extent_commit_sem);
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-26 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-26 13:26 [PATCH 1/2] rwsem: add rwsem_is_contended V3 Josef Bacik
2013-09-26 13:26 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2013-10-17 7:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: stop caching thread if extent_commit_sem is contended Alex Lyakas
2013-09-26 14:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] rwsem: add rwsem_is_contended V3 Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1380201996-17445-2-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com \
--to=jbacik@fusionio.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).