linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <walken@google.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<mingo@kernel.org>, <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: stop caching thread if extent_commit_sem is contended
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:26:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380201996-17445-2-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380201996-17445-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com>

We can starve out the transaction commit with a bunch of caching threads all
running at the same time.  This is because we will only drop the
extent_commit_sem if we need_resched(), which isn't likely to happen since we
will be reading a lot from the disk so have already schedule()'ed plenty.  Alex
observed that he could starve out a transaction commit for up to a minute with
32 caching threads all running at once.  This will allow us to drop the
extent_commit_sem to allow the transaction commit to swap the commit_root out
and then all the cachers will start back up. Here is an explanation provided by
Igno

So, just to fill in what happens in this loop:

                                mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
                                cond_resched();
                                goto again;

where 'again:' takes caching_ctl->mutex and fs_info->extent_commit_sem
again:

        again:
                mutex_lock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
                /* need to make sure the commit_root doesn't disappear */
                down_read(&fs_info->extent_commit_sem);

So, if I'm reading the code correct, there can be a fair amount of
concurrency here: there may be multiple 'caching kthreads' per filesystem
active, while there's one fs_info->extent_commit_sem per filesystem
AFAICS.

So, what happens if there are a lot of CPUs all busy holding the
->extent_commit_sem rwsem read-locked and a writer arrives? They'd all
rush to try to release the fs_info->extent_commit_sem, and they'd block in
the down_read() because there's a writer waiting.

So there's a guarantee of forward progress. This should answer akpm's
concern I think.

Thanks,

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index cfb3cf7..cc074c34 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -442,7 +442,8 @@ next:
 			if (ret)
 				break;
 
-			if (need_resched()) {
+			if (need_resched() ||
+			    rwsem_is_contended(&fs_info->extent_commit_sem)) {
 				caching_ctl->progress = last;
 				btrfs_release_path(path);
 				up_read(&fs_info->extent_commit_sem);
-- 
1.8.3.1


  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-26 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-26 13:26 [PATCH 1/2] rwsem: add rwsem_is_contended V3 Josef Bacik
2013-09-26 13:26 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2013-10-17  7:51   ` [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: stop caching thread if extent_commit_sem is contended Alex Lyakas
2013-09-26 14:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] rwsem: add rwsem_is_contended V3 Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1380201996-17445-2-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com \
    --to=jbacik@fusionio.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).