linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: foss@rolf.leggewie.biz
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:01:29 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1381094584.262772.1480359689092.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail11.arcor-online.net> (raw)

Hello,

I have a multi-device btrfs (with problems, more on that later). I looked into btrfs-image and was surprised to find that "for i in 5 6 7 8 ; do sudo btrfs-image -t2 /dev/sda$i - | md5sum;done" returns a different hash for sda7.  The other three hashes are the same, as I believe they all should be, or am I mistaken?

$ for i in 5 6 7 8 ; do echo -n sda$i:" " ; sudo btrfs-image -t2 -c9 /dev/sda$i - | tee /tmp/sda$i.img | md5sum;done
sda5: 047a1da23edeb9661e79d1006f17eab0  -
sda6: 047a1da23edeb9661e79d1006f17eab0  -
sda7: 9cc7afdc1476daa6f671db8d3c855164  -
sda8: 047a1da23edeb9661e79d1006f17eab0  -

$ sudo btrfs fi show
Label: 'SSD128'  uuid: f110a925-6ad9-4b40-9207-6bf09ce0cb23
	Total devices 4 FS bytes used 105.96GiB
	devid    1 size 100.00GiB used 100.00GiB path /dev/sda5
	devid    2 size 10.00GiB used 10.00GiB path /dev/sda6
	devid    3 size 5.00GiB used 5.00GiB path /dev/sda7
	devid    4 size 1.99GiB used 1.00GiB path /dev/sda8

The difference is somewhere very early on in the file:
$ wc -c /tmp/sda?.img
223763456 /tmp/sda5.img
223763456 /tmp/sda6.img
223763456 /tmp/sda7.img
223763456 /tmp/sda8.img
895053824 total
$ for file in /tmp/sda?.img;do echo -n $file: " "; tail -c 222950000 $file | md5sum;done
/tmp/sda5.img:  afe8010fa089415aaa55f2d549c3b5d4  -
/tmp/sda6.img:  afe8010fa089415aaa55f2d549c3b5d4  -
/tmp/sda7.img:  afe8010fa089415aaa55f2d549c3b5d4  -
/tmp/sda8.img:  afe8010fa089415aaa55f2d549c3b5d4  -
$ for file in /tmp/sda?.img;do echo -n $file: " "; tail -c 222960000 $file | md5sum;done
/tmp/sda5.img:  2bc5fe13e5f2dd8592a24eecb322482e  -
/tmp/sda6.img:  2bc5fe13e5f2dd8592a24eecb322482e  -
/tmp/sda7.img:  ee26d34afa50ccb33e95e869b3e18af3  -
/tmp/sda8.img:  2bc5fe13e5f2dd8592a24eecb322482e  -

How could this be?

Regards

Rolf


PS: While I will check back for replies in the archive, a courtesy cc will be appreciated since I am not subscribed to the list.

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-11-28 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1381094584.262772.1480359689092.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail11.arcor-online.net \
    --to=foss@rolf.leggewie.biz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).