From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11181 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751851Ab3JGVnN (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Oct 2013 17:43:13 -0400 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r97LhCgD000731 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 17:43:12 -0400 From: Zach Brown To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen Subject: [RFC] another round of static analysis fixes Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 14:42:53 -0700 Message-Id: <1381182185-10896-1-git-send-email-zab@redhat.com> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi friends, Eric imported a newer git snapshot of btrfs-progs into Red Hat's universe which kicked off a static analysis run which found a bunch of problems. This series is my attempt to fix the warnings that I agreed were either real bugs or messy code to clean up. This is against Dave's integration-next as of: commit 62f6537f8c9149283844c5e93a296e147c266247 Date: Fri Sep 13 19:32:23 2013 +0800 And totally untested. Review please? - z