From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] xfstests: add regression test for kernel bz 60673
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:26:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382120790-31060-2-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382120790-31060-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com>
There was a problem with send trying to overwrite a file that wasn't actually
the same. This is a test to check this particular case where receive fails when
it should succeed properly. I tested this to verify it fails without my fix and
passes with my fix. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
---
tests/btrfs/015 | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/btrfs/015.out | 2 +
tests/btrfs/group | 1 +
3 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/015
create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/015.out
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/015 b/tests/btrfs/015
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f35600f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/btrfs/015
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+# FS QA Test No. btrfs/015
+#
+# btrfs send ENOENT regression test, kernel bugzilla 60673
+#
+#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Copyright (c) 2013 Fusion IO. All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+# published by the Free Software Foundation.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
+# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
+#
+#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
+#
+
+seq=`basename $0`
+seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
+echo "QA output created by $seq"
+
+here=`pwd`
+tmp=/tmp/$$
+tmp_dir=send_temp_$seq
+
+status=1 # failure is the default!
+
+_cleanup()
+{
+ $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol del $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap1 > /dev/null 2>&1
+ $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol del $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap2 > /dev/null 2>&1
+ $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol del $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send > /dev/null 2>&1
+ rm -rf $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir
+ rm -f $tmp.*
+}
+
+trap "_cleanup ; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
+
+# get standard environment, filters and checks
+. ./common/rc
+. ./common/filter
+
+# real QA test starts here
+_supported_fs btrfs
+_supported_os Linux
+_require_scratch
+
+_scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1
+
+#receive needs to be able to setxattrs, including the selinux context, if we use
+#the normal nfs context thing it screws up our ability to set the
+#security.selinux xattrs so we need to disable this for this test
+export SELINUX_MOUNT_OPTIONS=""
+
+_scratch_mount
+
+mkdir $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir
+$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol create $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send \
+ > $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed subvol create"
+
+cd $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send
+
+mkdir test
+touch test/baz
+touch test/blah
+mkdir test/foo
+touch test/foo/bar
+
+# cd out in case any of this fails
+cd /
+
+$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol snap -r $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send \
+ $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed snap1"
+
+$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -f $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send1.dump \
+ $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed send"
+
+$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive -f $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send1.dump $SCRATCH_MNT \
+ >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed receive"
+
+#recreate everything exactly the way it was exceptn in a different order so we
+#get different inode numbers
+cd $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send
+rm -rf test
+mkdir test
+touch test/baz
+mkdir test/foo
+touch test/foo/bar
+touch test/blah
+cd /
+
+$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol snap -r $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send \
+ $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap2 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed snap2"
+
+$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -f $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send2.dump \
+ $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap2 -p $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap1 \
+ >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed second send"
+
+$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive -f $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send2.dump $SCRATCH_MNT \
+ >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed second receive"
+
+echo "Silence is golden"
+status=0 ; exit
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/015.out b/tests/btrfs/015.out
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fee0fcf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/btrfs/015.out
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+QA output created by 015
+Silence is golden
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
index 07df957..a6f1820 100644
--- a/tests/btrfs/group
+++ b/tests/btrfs/group
@@ -17,3 +17,4 @@
012 auto
013 auto quick
014 auto
+015 auto quick
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-18 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-18 18:26 [PATCH 1/8] xfstests: fix btrfs/002 to not use the scratch dev pool Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2013-10-21 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfstests: add regression test for kernel bz 60673 Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:09 ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:21 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfstests: stat the dev we're removing to make sure its' really gone V2 Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:10 ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfstests: btrfs/016: a hole punching send test Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 21:02 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfstests: generic/274 increase scratch fs size to 2g Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:29 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 20:25 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfstests: generic/311: add a few more test cases Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:37 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfstests: btrfs/017: add a regression test for snapshot creation Josef Bacik
2013-10-22 21:06 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfstests: btrfs/018: a regression test for subvolume rename Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 21:09 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-22 20:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfstests: fix btrfs/002 to not use the scratch dev pool Rich Johnston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1382120790-31060-2-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com \
--to=jbacik@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).