* [PATCH] xfstests: wipefs new device in btrfs/003
@ 2013-10-21 15:53 Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 20:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 21:17 ` Rich Johnston
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2013-10-21 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs, xfs
We changed btrfs device add to check and see if there is an existing fs on the
device we are adding, so you now have to do -f if you want to do this. In order
to get around checking to see if we have this version of btrfs-progs just wipefs
the device we're adding to make sure the device add will pass no matter which
version of btrfs-progs you have. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
---
common/config | 1 +
tests/btrfs/003 | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/common/config b/common/config
index 20c5b09..5dd7c7d 100644
--- a/common/config
+++ b/common/config
@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ export E4DEFRAG_PROG="`set_prog_path e4defrag`"
export LOGGER_PROG="`set_prog_path logger`"
export DBENCH_PROG="`set_prog_path dbench`"
export DMSETUP_PROG="`set_prog_path dmsetup`"
+export WIPEFS_PROG="`set_prog_path wipefs`"
# Generate a comparable xfsprogs version number in the form of
# major * 10000 + minor * 100 + release
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/003 b/tests/btrfs/003
index 15c2cc7..9105d06 100755
--- a/tests/btrfs/003
+++ b/tests/btrfs/003
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ _supported_os Linux
_require_scratch
_require_scratch_dev_pool
_require_deletable_scratch_dev_pool
+_require_command $WIPEFS_PROG
rm -f $seqres.full
@@ -109,6 +110,8 @@ _test_add()
dirp=`mktemp -duq $SCRATCH_MNT/dir.XXXXXX`
_populate_fs -n 1 -f 20 -d 10 -r $dirp -s 10
for i in `seq 2 $n`; do
+ $WIPEFS_PROG -a ${devs[$i]} >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || \
+ _fail "wipefs failed"
$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device add ${devs[$i]} $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "device add failed"
done
$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem balance $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "balance failed"
@@ -150,6 +153,7 @@ _test_replace()
# add a new disk to btrfs
ds=${devs[@]:$(($n)):1}
+ $WIPEFS_PROG -a ${ds} >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "wipefs failed"
$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device add ${ds} $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "dev add failed"
# in some system balance fails if there is no delay (a bug)
# putting sleep 10 to work around as of now
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfstests: wipefs new device in btrfs/003
2013-10-21 15:53 [PATCH] xfstests: wipefs new device in btrfs/003 Josef Bacik
@ 2013-10-21 20:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 21:17 ` Rich Johnston
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2013-10-21 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josef Bacik; +Cc: linux-btrfs, xfs
On 10/21/13 10:53 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> We changed btrfs device add to check and see if there is an existing fs on the
> device we are adding, so you now have to do -f if you want to do this. In order
> to get around checking to see if we have this version of btrfs-progs just wipefs
> the device we're adding to make sure the device add will pass no matter which
> version of btrfs-progs you have. Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
> common/config | 1 +
> tests/btrfs/003 | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/common/config b/common/config
> index 20c5b09..5dd7c7d 100644
> --- a/common/config
> +++ b/common/config
> @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ export E4DEFRAG_PROG="`set_prog_path e4defrag`"
> export LOGGER_PROG="`set_prog_path logger`"
> export DBENCH_PROG="`set_prog_path dbench`"
> export DMSETUP_PROG="`set_prog_path dmsetup`"
> +export WIPEFS_PROG="`set_prog_path wipefs`"
>
> # Generate a comparable xfsprogs version number in the form of
> # major * 10000 + minor * 100 + release
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/003 b/tests/btrfs/003
> index 15c2cc7..9105d06 100755
> --- a/tests/btrfs/003
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/003
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ _supported_os Linux
> _require_scratch
> _require_scratch_dev_pool
> _require_deletable_scratch_dev_pool
> +_require_command $WIPEFS_PROG
>
> rm -f $seqres.full
>
> @@ -109,6 +110,8 @@ _test_add()
> dirp=`mktemp -duq $SCRATCH_MNT/dir.XXXXXX`
> _populate_fs -n 1 -f 20 -d 10 -r $dirp -s 10
> for i in `seq 2 $n`; do
> + $WIPEFS_PROG -a ${devs[$i]} >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || \
> + _fail "wipefs failed"
> $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device add ${devs[$i]} $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "device add failed"
> done
> $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem balance $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "balance failed"
> @@ -150,6 +153,7 @@ _test_replace()
>
> # add a new disk to btrfs
> ds=${devs[@]:$(($n)):1}
> + $WIPEFS_PROG -a ${ds} >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "wipefs failed"
> $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device add ${ds} $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "dev add failed"
> # in some system balance fails if there is no delay (a bug)
> # putting sleep 10 to work around as of now
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfstests: wipefs new device in btrfs/003
2013-10-21 15:53 [PATCH] xfstests: wipefs new device in btrfs/003 Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 20:00 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2013-10-22 21:17 ` Rich Johnston
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rich Johnston @ 2013-10-22 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josef Bacik, linux-btrfs, xfs
This has been committed.
Thanks
--Rich
commit 4896f63ef5dddcfe9759cbd369b5fd35084ac193
Author: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Date: Mon Oct 21 15:53:16 2013 +0000
xfstests: wipefs new device in btrfs/003
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-22 21:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-21 15:53 [PATCH] xfstests: wipefs new device in btrfs/003 Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 20:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 21:17 ` Rich Johnston
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).