[PATCH 3/3] Btrfs: fix __btrfs_start_workers retval

[Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>]

__btrfs_start_workers returns 0 in case it raced with
btrfs_stop_workers and lost the race.  This is wrong because worker in
this case is not allowed to start and is in fact destroyed.  Return
-EINVAL instead.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/async-thread.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
index 08cc08f..1d5f3d7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
@@ -495,6 +495,7 @@ static int __btrfs_start_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers)
 	spin_lock_irq(&workers->lock);
 	if (workers->stopping) {
 		spin_unlock_irq(&workers->lock);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto fail_kthread;
 	}
 	list_add_tail(&worker->worker_list, &workers->idle_list);
-- 
1.7.10.4