From: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: wait for ordered extents before removing extent maps
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 14:43:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1387032218-29998-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@gmail.com> (raw)
Wang Shilong got into a case where during inode eviction we were
removing an extent map while it was pinned. This triggered a warning
in remove_extent_mapping() because the extent map had the pinned
flag set:
[ 1209.102076] [<ffffffffa04721b9>] remove_extent_mapping+0x69/0x70 [btrfs]
[ 1209.102084] [<ffffffffa0466b06>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x96/0x4d0 [btrfs]
[ 1209.102089] [<ffffffff81073010>] ? wake_atomic_t_function+0x40/0x40
[ 1209.102092] [<ffffffff8118ab2e>] evict+0x9e/0x190
[ 1209.102094] [<ffffffff8118b313>] iput+0xf3/0x180
[ 1209.102101] [<ffffffffa0461fd1>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0xb1/0xd0 [btrfs]
[ 1209.102107] [<ffffffffa045d358>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x268/0x350 [btrfs]
Therefore wait for any pending ordered extents, if any, which will
trigger calls to unpin_extent_cache(), before removing the extent maps.
Wang's solution of simply clearing the pinned bit wasn't enough, as after
unpin_extent_cache() will be called and trigger another WARN_ON() because
the lookup for the extent map returned NULL.
Thanks Wang for finding out this.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index e889779..c2933fb 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -4509,6 +4509,9 @@ static void evict_inode_truncate_pages(struct inode *inode)
ASSERT(inode->i_state & I_FREEING);
truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
+ /* do we really want it for ->i_nlink > 0 and zero btrfs_root_refs? */
+ btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, 0, (u64)-1);
+
write_lock(&map_tree->lock);
while (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&map_tree->map)) {
struct extent_map *em;
@@ -4566,8 +4569,6 @@ void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
btrfs_orphan_del(NULL, inode);
goto no_delete;
}
- /* do we really want it for ->i_nlink > 0 and zero btrfs_root_refs? */
- btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, 0, (u64)-1);
if (root->fs_info->log_root_recovering) {
BUG_ON(test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM,
--
1.7.9.5
next reply other threads:[~2013-12-14 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-14 14:43 Filipe David Borba Manana [this message]
2013-12-14 14:56 ` [PATCH] Btrfs: wait for ordered extents before removing extent maps Shilong Wang
2013-12-14 15:01 ` Filipe David Manana
2013-12-14 15:08 ` Shilong Wang
2013-12-14 15:13 ` Filipe David Manana
2013-12-14 15:51 ` Filipe David Manana
2013-12-15 3:34 ` Shilong Wang
2013-12-15 12:41 ` Filipe David Manana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1387032218-29998-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@gmail.com \
--to=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).