From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:59640 "EHLO mail-ee0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752144AbaARAQP (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:16:15 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id d17so2389662eek.23 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:16:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (host-115-115.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de. [134.130.115.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z49sm18010304eeo.10.2014.01.17.16.16.13 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:16:13 -0800 (PST) From: Gerhard Heift To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH RFC] new ioctl TREE_SEARCH_V2 Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 01:15:48 +0100 Message-Id: <1390004153-4228-1-git-send-email-Gerhard@Heift.Name> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This patch series adds a new ioctl TREE_SEARCH_V2 with which we could store the results in a varying buffer. Now even items larger than 3992 bytes or a large amount of items can be returned. I have a few questions: Which value should I assign to TREE_SEARCH_V2? Should we limit the buffer size? What about documentation? Gerhard