From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:34567 "EHLO mail-ee0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753687AbaA0N24 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:28:56 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b15so2259896eek.32 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:28:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (host-115-115.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de. [134.130.115.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 46sm42512336ees.4.2014.01.27.05.28.53 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:28:54 -0800 (PST) From: Gerhard Heift To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH RFCv2] new ioctl TREE_SEARCH_V2 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:28:26 +0100 Message-Id: <1390829312-814-1-git-send-email-Gerhard@Heift.Name> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This patch series adds a new ioctl TREE_SEARCH_V2 with which we could store the results in a varying buffer. Now even items larger than 3992 bytes or a large amount of items can be returned. I have a few questions: Which value should I assign to TREE_SEARCH_V2? Should we limit the buffer size? What about documentation? Changelog RFCv2 * fixed a build bug caused by using a wrong patch * added a patch to expand buffer lifetime Gerhard