From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2 v3] Btrfs: check if directory has already been created smarter
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:35:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1393493744-19294-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393487254-17978-2-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Currently to check whether a directory has been created, we search
DIR_INDEX items one by one to check if children has been processed.
Try to picture such a scenario:
.
|-- dir (ino X)
|-- foo_1 (ino X+1)
|-- ...
|-- foo_k (ino X+k)
With the current way, we have to check all the k DIR_INDEX items
to find it is a fresh new one.
So this introduced a rbtree to store those directories which are
created out of order, and in the above case, we just need an O(log n)
search instead of O(n) search.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
---
v3: fix typo, s/O(1)/O(n)/g, thanks Wang Shilong.
v2: fix wrong patch name.
fs/btrfs/send.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c
index 33063d1..fcad93c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/send.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c
@@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ struct send_ctx {
* own move/rename can be performed.
*/
struct rb_root waiting_dir_moves;
+
+ /* directories which are created out of order, check did_create_dir() */
+ struct rb_root out_of_order;
};
struct pending_dir_move {
@@ -2494,56 +2497,40 @@ out:
*/
static int did_create_dir(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 dir)
{
- int ret = 0;
- struct btrfs_path *path = NULL;
- struct btrfs_key key;
- struct btrfs_key found_key;
- struct btrfs_key di_key;
- struct extent_buffer *eb;
- struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
- int slot;
+ struct rb_node **p = &sctx->out_of_order.rb_node;
+ struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
+ struct send_dir_node *entry = NULL;
+ int cur_is_dir = !!(dir == sctx->cur_ino);
- path = alloc_path_for_send();
- if (!path) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto out;
- }
+ verbose_printk("dir=%llu cur_ino=%llu send_progress=%llu\n",
+ dir, sctx->cur_ino, sctx->send_progress);
- key.objectid = dir;
- key.type = BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY;
- key.offset = 0;
- while (1) {
- ret = btrfs_search_slot_for_read(sctx->send_root, &key, path,
- 1, 0);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out;
- if (!ret) {
- eb = path->nodes[0];
- slot = path->slots[0];
- btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, slot);
- }
- if (ret || found_key.objectid != key.objectid ||
- found_key.type != key.type) {
- ret = 0;
- goto out;
+ while (*p) {
+ parent = *p;
+ entry = rb_entry(parent, struct send_dir_node, node);
+ if (dir < entry->ino) {
+ p = &(*p)->rb_left;
+ } else if (dir > entry->ino) {
+ p = &(*p)->rb_right;
+ } else {
+ if (cur_is_dir) {
+ rb_erase(&entry->node, &sctx->out_of_order);
+ kfree(entry);
+ }
+ return 1;
}
+ }
- di = btrfs_item_ptr(eb, slot, struct btrfs_dir_item);
- btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(eb, di, &di_key);
-
- if (di_key.type != BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY &&
- di_key.objectid < sctx->send_progress) {
- ret = 1;
- goto out;
- }
+ if (!cur_is_dir) {
+ entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_NOFS);
+ if (!entry)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ entry->ino = dir;
- key.offset = found_key.offset + 1;
- btrfs_release_path(path);
+ rb_link_node(&entry->node, parent, p);
+ rb_insert_color(&entry->node, &sctx->out_of_order);
}
-
-out:
- btrfs_free_path(path);
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
/*
@@ -5340,6 +5327,7 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_file, void __user *arg_)
sctx->pending_dir_moves = RB_ROOT;
sctx->waiting_dir_moves = RB_ROOT;
+ sctx->out_of_order = RB_ROOT;
sctx->clone_roots = vzalloc(sizeof(struct clone_root) *
(arg->clone_sources_count + 1));
@@ -5477,6 +5465,17 @@ out:
kfree(dm);
}
+ WARN_ON(sctx && !ret && !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&sctx->out_of_order));
+ while (sctx && !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&sctx->out_of_order)) {
+ struct rb_node *n;
+ struct send_dir_node *entry;
+
+ n = rb_first(&sctx->out_of_order);
+ entry = rb_entry(n, struct send_dir_node, node);
+ rb_erase(&entry->node, &sctx->out_of_order);
+ kfree(entry);
+ }
+
if (sort_clone_roots) {
for (i = 0; i < sctx->clone_roots_cnt; i++)
btrfs_root_dec_send_in_progress(
--
1.8.2.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-27 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-27 7:47 [PATCH 1/2 v2] Btrfs: rename waiting_dir_move Liu Bo
2014-02-27 7:47 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] Btrfs: check if directory has already been created smarter Liu Bo
2014-02-27 8:01 ` Wang Shilong
2014-02-27 8:12 ` Liu Bo
2014-02-27 9:35 ` Liu Bo [this message]
2014-03-07 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] Btrfs: rename waiting_dir_move Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1393493744-19294-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox