From: "Ospan, Abylay" <aospan@amazon.com>
To: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: btrfs_extent_map memory consumption results in "Out of memory"
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 15:02:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13f94633dcf04d29aaf1f0a43d42c55e@amazon.com> (raw)
Greetings Btrfs development team!
I would like to express my gratitude for your outstanding work on Btrfs. However, I recently experienced an 'out of memory' issue as described below.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Run FIO test on a btrfs partition with random write on a 300GB file:
cat <<EOF >> rand.fio
[global]
name=fio-rand-write
filename=fio-rand-write
rw=randwrite
bs=4K
direct=1
numjobs=16
time_based
runtime=90000
[file1]
size=300G
ioengine=libaio
iodepth=16
EOF
fio rand.fio
2. Monitor slab consumption with "slabtop -s -a"
OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME
25820620 23138538 89% 0.14K 922165 28 3688660K btrfs_extent_map
3. Observe oom-killer:
[49689.294138] ip invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xc2cc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_NOMEMALLOC), order=3, oom_score_adj=0
...
[49689.294425] Unreclaimable slab info:
[49689.294426] Name Used Total
[49689.329363] btrfs_extent_map 3207098KB 3375622KB
...
Memory usage by btrfs_extent_map gradually increases until it reaches a critical point, causing the system to run out of memory.
Test environment: Intel CPU, 8GB RAM (To expedite the reproduction of this issue, I also conducted tests within QEMU with a restricted amount of memory).
Linux kernel tested: LTS 5.15.133, and mainline 6.6-rc5
Quick review of the 'fs/btrfs/extent_map.c' code reveals no built-in limitations on memory allocation for extents mapping.
Are there any known workarounds or alternative solutions to mitigate this issue?
Thank you!
--
Abylay Ospan
next reply other threads:[~2023-10-10 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-10 15:02 Ospan, Abylay [this message]
2023-10-10 15:47 ` btrfs_extent_map memory consumption results in "Out of memory" Filipe Manana
2023-10-10 21:23 ` Ospan, Abylay
2023-10-10 21:44 ` Filipe Manana
2023-10-12 14:24 ` Ospan, Abylay
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-18 22:45 fdavidl073rnovn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13f94633dcf04d29aaf1f0a43d42c55e@amazon.com \
--to=aospan@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).