* [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite
@ 2014-06-24 12:51 Anand Jain
2014-06-24 12:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: we are not yet ready if device is missing Anand Jain
2014-06-30 8:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite Anand Jain
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2014-06-24 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Reproducer 1:
modprobe -r btrfs; modprobe btrfs
while true ; do mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sde > /dev/null 2>&1; done
CTLR-C
we keep stale FSIDs.
btrfs-devlist | egrep "/dev/sde" | wc -l
41
Reproducer 2:
mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid1 /dev/sdd /dev/sdf
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdf
btrfs dev ready /dev/sdd
echo $?
0 <-- wrong
fix this at device_list_add() to check and delete if the newly added disk path
is already in the device list
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index b107ad8..91ba2cf 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -598,6 +598,40 @@ static void pending_bios_fn(struct btrfs_work *work)
run_scheduled_bios(device);
}
+static void find_delete_duplicate_dev(struct btrfs_device *new_dev)
+{
+ struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devs;
+ struct btrfs_fs_devices *cur_fs_devs;
+ struct btrfs_device *dev;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(fs_devs, &fs_uuids, list) {
+
+ if (new_dev->fs_devices == fs_devs || fs_devs->opened)
+ continue;
+
+ cur_fs_devs = fs_devs;
+ list_for_each_entry(dev, &cur_fs_devs->devices, dev_list) {
+
+ if (dev->name && !strcmp(new_dev->name->str,
+ dev->name->str)) {
+ if (cur_fs_devs->num_devices == 1) {
+ free_fs_devices(cur_fs_devs);
+ } else {
+ mutex_lock(&cur_fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
+ list_del_rcu(&dev->dev_list);
+ cur_fs_devs->num_devices--;
+ if (dev->missing)
+ cur_fs_devs->missing_devices--;
+ mutex_unlock(&cur_fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
+ rcu_string_free(dev->name);
+ kfree(dev);
+ }
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
static noinline int device_list_add(const char *path,
struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super,
u64 devid, struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret)
@@ -708,6 +742,13 @@ static noinline int device_list_add(const char *path,
fs_devices->latest_devid = devid;
fs_devices->latest_trans = found_transid;
}
+
+ /*
+ * if new fs is created on the same path we need to clean
+ * the old one.
+ */
+ find_delete_duplicate_dev(device);
+
*fs_devices_ret = fs_devices;
return 0;
}
--
2.0.0.257.g75cc6c6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: we are not yet ready if device is missing
2014-06-24 12:51 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite Anand Jain
@ 2014-06-24 12:51 ` Anand Jain
2014-06-30 8:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite Anand Jain
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2014-06-24 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
reproducer:
mkfs.btrfs -f -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/sdf /dev/sdd
modprobe -r btrfs && modprobe btrfs
mount -o degraded /dev/sdd /btrfs <-- calls add_missing_dev() to add missing btrfs_device
umount /btrfs
btrfs dev ready /dev/sdd
echo $?
0
mount /dev/sdd /btrfs
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdd,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error
fix this by checking if the device name is present in the BTRFS_IOC_DEVICES_READY
ioctl
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/super.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index b9efe58..74ef9bf 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -1857,6 +1857,7 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
int ret = -ENOTTY;
void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
+ struct btrfs_device *dev;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
@@ -1882,6 +1883,14 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
kfree(vol);
if (ret)
break;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(dev, &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) {
+ if (dev->name)
+ continue;
+
+ return !0;
+ }
+
ret = !(fs_devices->num_devices == fs_devices->total_devices);
break;
case BTRFS_IOC_GET_FSLIST:
--
2.0.0.257.g75cc6c6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite
2014-06-24 12:51 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite Anand Jain
2014-06-24 12:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: we are not yet ready if device is missing Anand Jain
@ 2014-06-30 8:31 ` Anand Jain
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2014-06-30 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anand Jain; +Cc: linux-btrfs
NACK for this. I have null pointer deference with this patch.
extremely sorry. I am investigating..
Anand
On 24/06/2014 20:51, Anand Jain wrote:
> Reproducer 1:
> modprobe -r btrfs; modprobe btrfs
>
> while true ; do mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sde > /dev/null 2>&1; done
> CTLR-C
> we keep stale FSIDs.
>
> btrfs-devlist | egrep "/dev/sde" | wc -l
> 41
>
> Reproducer 2:
> mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid1 /dev/sdd /dev/sdf
> mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdf
> btrfs dev ready /dev/sdd
> echo $?
> 0 <-- wrong
>
> fix this at device_list_add() to check and delete if the newly added disk path
> is already in the device list
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index b107ad8..91ba2cf 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -598,6 +598,40 @@ static void pending_bios_fn(struct btrfs_work *work)
> run_scheduled_bios(device);
> }
>
> +static void find_delete_duplicate_dev(struct btrfs_device *new_dev)
> +{
> + struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devs;
> + struct btrfs_fs_devices *cur_fs_devs;
> + struct btrfs_device *dev;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(fs_devs, &fs_uuids, list) {
> +
> + if (new_dev->fs_devices == fs_devs || fs_devs->opened)
> + continue;
> +
> + cur_fs_devs = fs_devs;
> + list_for_each_entry(dev, &cur_fs_devs->devices, dev_list) {
> +
> + if (dev->name && !strcmp(new_dev->name->str,
> + dev->name->str)) {
> + if (cur_fs_devs->num_devices == 1) {
> + free_fs_devices(cur_fs_devs);
> + } else {
> + mutex_lock(&cur_fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
> + list_del_rcu(&dev->dev_list);
> + cur_fs_devs->num_devices--;
> + if (dev->missing)
> + cur_fs_devs->missing_devices--;
> + mutex_unlock(&cur_fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
> + rcu_string_free(dev->name);
> + kfree(dev);
> + }
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static noinline int device_list_add(const char *path,
> struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super,
> u64 devid, struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret)
> @@ -708,6 +742,13 @@ static noinline int device_list_add(const char *path,
> fs_devices->latest_devid = devid;
> fs_devices->latest_trans = found_transid;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * if new fs is created on the same path we need to clean
> + * the old one.
> + */
> + find_delete_duplicate_dev(device);
> +
> *fs_devices_ret = fs_devices;
> return 0;
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-30 8:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-24 12:51 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite Anand Jain
2014-06-24 12:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: we are not yet ready if device is missing Anand Jain
2014-06-30 8:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite Anand Jain
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).