* [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: don't assert when we have an invalid mapping
@ 2014-09-25 20:10 Josef Bacik
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2014-09-25 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Asserting is no fun, we may be able to recover from this error in certain cases
(like btrfs-image and btrfsck). Just do what the kernel does and spit out an
error and return that there is only 1 copy. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
---
volumes.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
index 388c94e..009ce78 100644
--- a/volumes.c
+++ b/volumes.c
@@ -1136,8 +1136,20 @@ int btrfs_num_copies(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree, u64 logical, u64 len)
int ret;
ce = search_cache_extent(&map_tree->cache_tree, logical);
- BUG_ON(!ce);
- BUG_ON(ce->start > logical || ce->start + ce->size < logical);
+ if (!ce) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "No mapping for %llu-%llu\n",
+ (unsigned long long)logical,
+ (unsigned long long)logical+len);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ if (ce->start > logical || ce->start + ce->size < logical) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Invalid mapping for %llu-%llu, got "
+ "%llu-%llu\n", (unsigned long long)logical,
+ (unsigned long long)logical+len,
+ (unsigned long long)ce->start,
+ (unsigned long long)ce->start + ce->size);
+ return 1;
+ }
map = container_of(ce, struct map_lookup, ce);
if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1))
--
1.9.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-09-25 20:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-25 20:10 [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: don't assert when we have an invalid mapping Josef Bacik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).