Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
To: Patrick Schmid <schmid@phys.ethz.ch>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck - Kernel 3.17.2
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:12:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415905935.25389.4@mail.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54650166.1090800@phys.ethz.ch>



On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Patrick Schmid <schmid@phys.ethz.ch> 
wrote:
> On 11/13/2014 03:49 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Patrick Schmid <schmid@phys.ethz.ch>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> we run a > 500 TiB backup system on iSCSI targets using 19 BTRFS
>>> filesystems (the biggest of which is 110 TiB) on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 
>>> and
>>> various kernel versions. Btrfs-Progs v3.17.1. The hardware is a 24
>>> core
>>> Xeon E5-2620 on an Intel S2600GZ board with 128 GiB RAM.
>>> 
>>> Since btrfs has changed to kworkers (I think in 3.15) the frontend
>>> server somewhat randomly crashes with soft lockups (see attachment).
>>> The
>>> system is rock solid with the 3.14.22 kernel.
>>> 
>>> The lockups happen during the nightly cron-controlled rsync backups
>>> and
>>> occur at random times during this process.
>>> We are totally aware of the fact that this tends to be one of
>>> those “it doesn’t work” bug reports, but
>>> it’s really hard to pin
>>> down the source of the problem other than it seems to be related to
>>> the
>>> kworkers. We’d love to provide any feedback we can, please 
>>> let
>>> us know
>>> what you need.
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> This may actually be related to a different btrfs change in the 3.15
>> kernel.  Do you see more than one soft lockup?  After the softlockup,
>> does the box recover or is it stuck forever?
>> 
>> -chris
>> 
> 
> Hi Chris
> 
> "Normaly" are there more than one soft lockup and the load goes up to 
> sky and the server stuck forever until hard reset.
> 
> If you want, i send you tomorrow morning the whole kernel log?

Yes, the whole log would be great, thanks!

-chris




  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-13 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-13 13:32 soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck - Kernel 3.17.2 Patrick Schmid
2014-11-13 14:49 ` Chris Mason
2014-11-13 19:07   ` Patrick Schmid
2014-11-13 19:12     ` Chris Mason [this message]
     [not found]       ` <54659FDB.6070300@phys.ethz.ch>
2014-11-14 17:39         ` Chris Mason
2014-11-14 18:23           ` Patrick Schmid
2014-11-14 18:31             ` Chris Mason
2014-11-14 23:47               ` Chris Mason
2014-11-21 13:01                 ` Patrick Schmid
2014-11-21 13:16                   ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1415905935.25389.4@mail.thefacebook.com \
    --to=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schmid@phys.ethz.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox