Re: btrfs raid1 and btrfs raid10 arrays NOT REDUNDANT

Chris Samuel
2014-01-04T11:20:27Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1101 bytes --]

On Sat, 4 Jan 2014 06:10:14 AM Duncan wrote:

> Btrfs remains under development and there are clear warnings
> about using it without backups one hasn't tested recovery from
> or are not otherwise prepared to actually use. It's stated in
> multiple locations on the wiki; it's stated on the kernel btrfs
> config option, and it's stated in mkfs.btrfs output when you
> create the filesystem.

Actually the scary warnings are gone from the Kconfig file for what will be the
3.13 kernel. Removed by this commit:

commit 4204617d142c0887e45fda2562cb5c58097b918e
Author: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Date: Wed Nov 20 14:32:34 2013 +0100

btrfs: update kconfig help text

Reflect the current status. Portions of the text taken from the
wiki pages.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC

This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic.
For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 482 bytes --]