linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: remove empty fs_devices to prevent memory runout
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:15:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1416809704.3822.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <546F1BE6.6030708@oracle.com>

On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 19:03 +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Hi Gui,
> 
>   Thanks for attempting this.
> 
>   There was this patch previously attempted for the same problem,
>   which I had to nack..
>     [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite
> 
>   I haven't seen your fix in full yet, But looks like you are using
>   dev_t to suffice the problem of identifying unique device. wonder
>   how does this would this react when device goes through the disappear
>   and reappear events ?
> 
> Thanks, Anand
> 

Hi Anand,

Thanks for your comments.
Definitly we are dealing with the same problem, but in different ways.
And as you see there are cases relating to replace & seed to handle.
With my patch, the device "stealing" problem which causes possible
memory leak has gone.

Oh, yes, the disappear & reappear problem is really a piece missing.
Disappear & reappear causes dev_t to change for the same physical
device, and there is certain to be "dead" btrfs_device objects that can
not be found by anybody in my rb_tree.
In my mind, check the rb_tree for "dead"s every time it changes is
neccessary to handle the problem.
But there should be more efficient ways to go, any suggestions?

Thanks,
Gui

> On 11/20/14 10:15 AM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
> > There is a global list @fs_uuids to keep @fs_devices object
> > for each created btrfs. But when a btrfs becomes "empty"
> > (all devices belong to it are gone), its @fs_devices remains
> > in @fs_uuids list until module exit.
> > If we keeps mkfs.btrfs on the same device again and again,
> > all empty @fs_devices produced are sure to eat up our memory.
> > So this case has better to be prevented.
> >
> > I think that each time we setup btrfs on that device, we should
> > check whether we are stealing some device from another btrfs
> > seen before. To faciliate the search procedure, we could insert
> > all @btrfs_device in a rb_root, one @btrfs_device per each physical
> > device, with @bdev->bd_dev as key. Each time device stealing happens,
> > we should replace the corresponding @btrfs_device in the rb_root with
> > an up-to-date version.
> > If the stolen device is the last device in its @fs_devices,
> > then we have an empty btrfs to be deleted.
> >
> > Actually there are 3 ways to steal devices and lead to empty btrfs
> >          1. mkfs, with -f option
> >          2. device add, with -f option
> >          3. device replace, with -f option
> > We should act under these cases.
> >
> > Moreover, if there are seed devices, then it is asured that
> > the devices in cloned @fs_devices are not treated as valid devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> >   fs/btrfs/super.c   |   1 +
> >   fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >   fs/btrfs/volumes.h |   6 ++
> >   3 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> > index 54bd91e..ee09a56 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> > @@ -2154,6 +2154,7 @@ static void __exit exit_btrfs_fs(void)
> >   	btrfs_end_io_wq_exit();
> >   	unregister_filesystem(&btrfs_fs_type);
> >   	btrfs_exit_sysfs();
> > +	btrfs_cleanup_valid_dev_root();
> >   	btrfs_cleanup_fs_uuids();
> >   	btrfs_exit_compress();
> >   	btrfs_hash_exit();
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > index 0192051..ba86b1b 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/kthread.h>
> >   #include <linux/raid/pq.h>
> >   #include <linux/semaphore.h>
> > +#include <linux/rbtree.h>
> >   #include <asm/div64.h>
> >   #include "ctree.h"
> >   #include "extent_map.h"
> > @@ -52,6 +53,120 @@ static void btrfs_dev_stat_print_on_load(struct btrfs_device *device);
> >
> >   DEFINE_MUTEX(uuid_mutex);
> >   static LIST_HEAD(fs_uuids);
> > +static struct rb_root valid_dev_root = RB_ROOT;
> > +
> > +static struct btrfs_device *insert_valid_device(struct btrfs_device *new_dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct rb_node **p;
> > +	struct rb_node *parent;
> > +	struct rb_node *new;
> > +	struct btrfs_device *old_dev;
> > +
> > +	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&uuid_mutex));
> > +
> > +	parent = NULL;
> > +	new = &new_dev->rb_node;
> > +
> > +	p = &valid_dev_root.rb_node;
> > +	while (*p) {
> > +		parent = *p;
> > +		old_dev = rb_entry(parent, struct btrfs_device, rb_node);
> > +
> > +		if (new_dev->devnum < old_dev->devnum)
> > +			p = &parent->rb_left;
> > +		else if (new_dev->devnum > old_dev->devnum)
> > +			p = &parent->rb_right;
> > +		else {
> > +			rb_replace_node(parent, new, &valid_dev_root);
> > +			RB_CLEAR_NODE(parent);
> > +
> > +			goto out;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	old_dev = NULL;
> > +	rb_link_node(new, parent, p);
> > +	rb_insert_color(new, &valid_dev_root);
> > +
> > +out:
> > +	return old_dev;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void free_fs_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices)
> > +{
> > +	struct btrfs_device *device;
> > +	WARN_ON(fs_devices->opened);
> > +	while (!list_empty(&fs_devices->devices)) {
> > +		device = list_entry(fs_devices->devices.next,
> > +				    struct btrfs_device, dev_list);
> > +		list_del(&device->dev_list);
> > +		rcu_string_free(device->name);
> > +		kfree(device);
> > +	}
> > +	kfree(fs_devices);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void remove_empty_fs_if_need(struct btrfs_fs_devices *old_fs)
> > +{
> > +	struct btrfs_fs_devices *seed_fs;
> > +
> > +	if (!list_empty(&old_fs->devices))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	list_del(&old_fs->list);
> > +
> > +	/* free the seed clones */
> > +	seed_fs = old_fs->seed;
> > +	free_fs_devices(old_fs);
> > +	while (seed_fs) {
> > +		old_fs = seed_fs;
> > +		seed_fs = seed_fs->seed;
> > +		free_fs_devices(old_fs);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void replace_invalid_device(struct btrfs_device *new_dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct btrfs_device *invalid_dev;
> > +	struct btrfs_fs_devices *old_fs;
> > +
> > +	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&uuid_mutex));
> > +
> > +	invalid_dev = insert_valid_device(new_dev);
> > +	if (!invalid_dev)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	old_fs = invalid_dev->fs_devices;
> > +	mutex_lock(&old_fs->device_list_mutex);
> > +	list_del(&invalid_dev->dev_list);
> > +	rcu_string_free(invalid_dev->name);
> > +	kfree(invalid_dev);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&old_fs->device_list_mutex);
> > +
> > +	remove_empty_fs_if_need(old_fs);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void remove_valid_device(struct btrfs_device *old_dev)
> > +{
> > +	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&uuid_mutex));
> > +
> > +	if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&old_dev->rb_node)) {
> > +		rb_erase(&old_dev->rb_node, &valid_dev_root);
> > +		RB_CLEAR_NODE(&old_dev->rb_node);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +void btrfs_cleanup_valid_dev_root(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct rb_node *rb_node;
> > +
> > +	rb_node = rb_first(&valid_dev_root);
> > +	while (rb_node) {
> > +		rb_erase(rb_node, &valid_dev_root);
> > +		rb_node = rb_first(&valid_dev_root);
> > +	}
> > +}
> >
> >   static void lock_chunks(struct btrfs_root *root)
> >   {
> > @@ -106,20 +221,6 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_devices *alloc_fs_devices(const u8 *fsid)
> >   	return fs_devs;
> >   }
> >
> > -static void free_fs_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices)
> > -{
> > -	struct btrfs_device *device;
> > -	WARN_ON(fs_devices->opened);
> > -	while (!list_empty(&fs_devices->devices)) {
> > -		device = list_entry(fs_devices->devices.next,
> > -				    struct btrfs_device, dev_list);
> > -		list_del(&device->dev_list);
> > -		rcu_string_free(device->name);
> > -		kfree(device);
> > -	}
> > -	kfree(fs_devices);
> > -}
> > -
> >   static void btrfs_kobject_uevent(struct block_device *bdev,
> >   				 enum kobject_action action)
> >   {
> > @@ -165,6 +266,8 @@ static struct btrfs_device *__alloc_device(void)
> >   	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&dev->reada_zones, GFP_NOFS & ~__GFP_WAIT);
> >   	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&dev->reada_extents, GFP_NOFS & ~__GFP_WAIT);
> >
> > +	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&dev->rb_node);
> > +
> >   	return dev;
> >   }
> >
> > @@ -461,7 +564,7 @@ static void pending_bios_fn(struct btrfs_work *work)
> >    * < 0 - error
> >    */
> >   static noinline int device_list_add(const char *path,
> > -			   struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super,
> > +			   struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super, dev_t devnum,
> >   			   u64 devid, struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret)
> >   {
> >   	struct btrfs_device *device;
> > @@ -509,6 +612,8 @@ static noinline int device_list_add(const char *path,
> >
> >   		ret = 1;
> >   		device->fs_devices = fs_devices;
> > +		device->devnum = devnum;
> > +		replace_invalid_device(device);
> >   	} else if (!device->name || strcmp(device->name->str, path)) {
> >   		/*
> >   		 * When FS is already mounted.
> > @@ -609,6 +714,7 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_devices *clone_fs_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *orig)
> >
> >   		list_add(&device->dev_list, &fs_devices->devices);
> >   		device->fs_devices = fs_devices;
> > +		device->devnum = orig_dev->devnum;
> >   		fs_devices->num_devices++;
> >   	}
> >   	mutex_unlock(&orig->device_list_mutex);
> > @@ -619,6 +725,15 @@ error:
> >   	return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >   }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * If @fs_devices is not in global list @fs_uuids,
> > + * then it is a cloned btrfs_fs_devices for seeding
> > + */
> > +static int is_cloned_fs_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices)
> > +{
> > +	return list_empty(&fs_devices->list);
> > +}
> > +
> >   void btrfs_close_extra_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >   			       struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, int step)
> >   {
> > @@ -665,6 +780,10 @@ again:
> >   				fs_devices->rw_devices--;
> >   		}
> >   		list_del_init(&device->dev_list);
> > +
> > +		/* skip cloned fs_devices which act as seed devices*/
> > +		if (!is_cloned_fs_devices(fs_devices))
> > +			remove_valid_device(device);
> >   		fs_devices->num_devices--;
> >   		rcu_string_free(device->name);
> >   		kfree(device);
> > @@ -740,6 +859,11 @@ static int __btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices)
> >
> >   		list_replace_rcu(&device->dev_list, &new_device->dev_list);
> >   		new_device->fs_devices = device->fs_devices;
> > +		new_device->devnum = device->devnum;
> > +
> > +		/* skip cloned fs_devices which act as seed devices*/
> > +		if (!is_cloned_fs_devices(device->fs_devices))
> > +			insert_valid_device(new_device);
> >
> >   		call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device);
> >   	}
> > @@ -952,7 +1076,8 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
> >   	transid = btrfs_super_generation(disk_super);
> >   	total_devices = btrfs_super_num_devices(disk_super);
> >
> > -	ret = device_list_add(path, disk_super, devid, fs_devices_ret);
> > +	ret = device_list_add(path, disk_super, bdev->bd_dev,
> > +				devid, fs_devices_ret);
> >   	if (ret > 0) {
> >   		if (disk_super->label[0]) {
> >   			if (disk_super->label[BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE - 1])
> > @@ -1682,6 +1807,7 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_root *root, char *device_path)
> >   	 */
> >
> >   	cur_devices = device->fs_devices;
> > +	remove_valid_device(device);
> >   	mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
> >   	list_del_rcu(&device->dev_list);
> >
> > @@ -1829,6 +1955,8 @@ void btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >
> >   	if (srcdev->bdev)
> >   		fs_devices->open_devices--;
> > +
> > +	remove_valid_device(srcdev);
> >   }
> >
> >   void btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> > @@ -1883,6 +2011,7 @@ void btrfs_destroy_dev_replace_tgtdev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >   	if (tgtdev->bdev == fs_info->fs_devices->latest_bdev)
> >   		fs_info->fs_devices->latest_bdev = next_device->bdev;
> >   	list_del_rcu(&tgtdev->dev_list);
> > +	remove_valid_device(tgtdev);
> >
> >   	call_rcu(&tgtdev->rcu, free_device);
> >
> > @@ -1975,12 +2104,22 @@ static int btrfs_prepare_sprout(struct btrfs_root *root)
> >   		return PTR_ERR(old_devices);
> >   	}
> >
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Here @old_devices represent the fs_devices that will be linked
> > +	 * in the fs_uuids, and devices in it should be valid.
> > +	 * All devices in @fs_devices which will be moved into @seed_devices
> > +	 * and they just act as clones. So replace those clones which sit
> > +	 * in @dev_map_root for now with valid devices in @old_devices.
> > +	 */
> > +	list_for_each_entry(device, &old_devices->devices, dev_list)
> > +		insert_valid_device(device);
> >   	list_add(&old_devices->list, &fs_uuids);
> >
> >   	memcpy(seed_devices, fs_devices, sizeof(*seed_devices));
> >   	seed_devices->opened = 1;
> >   	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&seed_devices->devices);
> >   	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&seed_devices->alloc_list);
> > +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&seed_devices->list);
> >   	mutex_init(&seed_devices->device_list_mutex);
> >
> >   	mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
> > @@ -2178,6 +2317,7 @@ int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_root *root, char *device_path)
> >   	}
> >
> >   	device->fs_devices = root->fs_info->fs_devices;
> > +	device->devnum = bdev->bd_dev;
> >
> >   	mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
> >   	lock_chunks(root);
> > @@ -2277,6 +2417,10 @@ int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_root *root, char *device_path)
> >   		ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans, root);
> >   	}
> >
> > +	mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
> > +	replace_invalid_device(device);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
> > +
> >   	/* Update ctime/mtime for libblkid */
> >   	update_dev_time(device_path);
> >   	return ret;
> > @@ -2378,11 +2522,16 @@ int btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev(struct btrfs_root *root, char *device_path,
> >   	device->dev_stats_valid = 1;
> >   	set_blocksize(device->bdev, 4096);
> >   	device->fs_devices = fs_info->fs_devices;
> > +	device->devnum = bdev->bd_dev;
> >   	list_add(&device->dev_list, &fs_info->fs_devices->devices);
> >   	fs_info->fs_devices->num_devices++;
> >   	fs_info->fs_devices->open_devices++;
> >   	mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
> >
> > +	mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
> > +	replace_invalid_device(device);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
> > +
> >   	*device_out = device;
> >   	return ret;
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> > index 4cc00e6..7b57cc6 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> > @@ -80,6 +80,11 @@ struct btrfs_device {
> >   	seqcount_t data_seqcount;
> >   #endif
> >
> > +	struct rb_node rb_node;
> > +
> > +	/* node key in valid_dev_root */
> > +	dev_t devnum;
> > +
> >   	/* the internal btrfs device id */
> >   	u64 devid;
> >
> > @@ -418,6 +423,7 @@ struct btrfs_device *btrfs_alloc_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >   					const u64 *devid,
> >   					const u8 *uuid);
> >   int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_root *root, char *device_path);
> > +void btrfs_cleanup_valid_dev_root(void);
> >   void btrfs_cleanup_fs_uuids(void);
> >   int btrfs_num_copies(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 logical, u64 len);
> >   int btrfs_grow_device(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> >



  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-24  6:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-20  2:15 [PATCH] btrfs: remove empty fs_devices to prevent memory runout Gui Hecheng
2014-11-21 11:03 ` Anand Jain
2014-11-24  6:15   ` Gui Hecheng [this message]
2014-12-01  3:39   ` [PATCH v2] " Gui Hecheng
2014-12-10  7:39     ` [PATCH] btrfs: introduce shrinker for rb_tree that keeps valid btrfs_devices Gui Hecheng
2015-01-08  2:42       ` Gui Hecheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1416809704.3822.18.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=Anand.Jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).