From: Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>, Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 15/15] Btrfs: Introduce BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK to check raid56 simply
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:34:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421152488-30548-16-git-send-email-zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421152488-30548-1-git-send-email-zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
From: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
So we can check raid56 with:
(map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK)
instead of long:
(map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6))
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 3 +++
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 +--
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 17 ++++++-----------
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 7e60741..f6caf77 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -1020,6 +1020,9 @@ enum btrfs_raid_types {
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 | \
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP | \
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10)
+#define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 | \
+ BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)
+
/*
* We need a bit for restriper to be able to tell when chunks of type
* SINGLE are available. This "extended" profile format is used in
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 8a036ed..54295a6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -7808,8 +7808,7 @@ static int btrfs_submit_direct_hook(int rw, struct btrfs_dio_private *dip,
}
/* async crcs make it difficult to collect full stripe writes. */
- if (btrfs_get_alloc_profile(root, 1) &
- (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6))
+ if (btrfs_get_alloc_profile(root, 1) & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK)
async_submit = 0;
else
async_submit = 1;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index 68033d2..d34b971 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -1293,7 +1293,7 @@ static inline void scrub_stripe_index_and_offset(u64 logical, u64 map_type,
{
int i;
- if (map_type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)) {
+ if (map_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
/* RAID5/6 */
for (i = 0; i < nstripes; i++) {
if (raid_map[i] == RAID6_Q_STRIPE ||
@@ -1440,8 +1440,7 @@ static void scrub_bio_wait_endio(struct bio *bio, int error)
static inline int scrub_is_page_on_raid56(struct scrub_page *page)
{
return page->recover &&
- (page->recover->bbio->map_type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 |
- BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6));
+ (page->recover->bbio->map_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK);
}
static int scrub_submit_raid56_bio_wait(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
@@ -3014,8 +3013,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
} else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP) {
increment = map->stripe_len;
mirror_num = num % map->num_stripes + 1;
- } else if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 |
- BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)) {
+ } else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
get_raid56_logic_offset(physical, num, map, &offset, NULL);
increment = map->stripe_len * nr_data_stripes(map);
mirror_num = 1;
@@ -3049,8 +3047,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
*/
logical = base + offset;
physical_end = physical + nstripes * map->stripe_len;
- if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 |
- BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)) {
+ if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
get_raid56_logic_offset(physical_end, num,
map, &logic_end, NULL);
logic_end += base;
@@ -3096,8 +3093,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
ret = 0;
while (physical < physical_end) {
/* for raid56, we skip parity stripe */
- if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 |
- BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)) {
+ if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
ret = get_raid56_logic_offset(physical, num,
map, &logical, &stripe_logical);
logical += base;
@@ -3255,8 +3251,7 @@ again:
scrub_free_csums(sctx);
if (extent_logical + extent_len <
key.objectid + bytes) {
- if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 |
- BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)) {
+ if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
/*
* loop until we find next data stripe
* or we have finished all stripes.
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 1b0de3a..02a7b66 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -4196,7 +4196,7 @@ static u32 find_raid56_stripe_len(u32 data_devices, u32 dev_stripe_target)
static void check_raid56_incompat_flag(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 type)
{
- if (!(type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)))
+ if (!(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK))
return;
btrfs_set_fs_incompat(info, RAID56);
@@ -4803,10 +4803,8 @@ unsigned long btrfs_full_stripe_len(struct btrfs_root *root,
BUG_ON(em->start > logical || em->start + em->len < logical);
map = (struct map_lookup *)em->bdev;
- if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 |
- BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)) {
+ if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK)
len = map->stripe_len * nr_data_stripes(map);
- }
free_extent_map(em);
return len;
}
@@ -4826,8 +4824,7 @@ int btrfs_is_parity_mirror(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree,
BUG_ON(em->start > logical || em->start + em->len < logical);
map = (struct map_lookup *)em->bdev;
- if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 |
- BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6))
+ if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK)
ret = 1;
free_extent_map(em);
return ret;
@@ -4998,7 +4995,7 @@ static int __btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int rw,
stripe_offset = offset - stripe_offset;
/* if we're here for raid56, we need to know the stripe aligned start */
- if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)) {
+ if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
unsigned long full_stripe_len = stripe_len * nr_data_stripes(map);
raid56_full_stripe_start = offset;
@@ -5011,8 +5008,7 @@ static int __btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int rw,
if (rw & REQ_DISCARD) {
/* we don't discard raid56 yet */
- if (map->type &
- (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)) {
+ if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
goto out;
}
@@ -5022,7 +5018,7 @@ static int __btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int rw,
/* For writes to RAID[56], allow a full stripeset across all disks.
For other RAID types and for RAID[56] reads, just allow a single
stripe (on a single disk). */
- if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6) &&
+ if ((map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) &&
(rw & REQ_WRITE)) {
max_len = stripe_len * nr_data_stripes(map) -
(offset - raid56_full_stripe_start);
@@ -5188,8 +5184,7 @@ static int __btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int rw,
mirror_num = stripe_index - old_stripe_index + 1;
}
- } else if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 |
- BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)) {
+ } else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
if (need_raid_map &&
((rw & (REQ_WRITE | REQ_GET_READ_MIRRORS)) ||
mirror_num > 1)) {
@@ -5253,7 +5248,7 @@ static int __btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int rw,
bbio->tgtdev_map = (int *)(bbio->stripes + num_alloc_stripes);
/* build raid_map */
- if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6) &&
+ if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK &&
need_raid_map && ((rw & (REQ_WRITE | REQ_GET_READ_MIRRORS)) ||
mirror_num > 1)) {
u64 tmp;
@@ -5534,8 +5529,7 @@ int btrfs_rmap_block(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree,
do_div(length, map->num_stripes / map->sub_stripes);
else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0)
do_div(length, map->num_stripes);
- else if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 |
- BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)) {
+ else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
do_div(length, nr_data_stripes(map));
rmap_len = map->stripe_len * nr_data_stripes(map);
}
--
1.8.5.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-13 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-13 12:34 [PATCH 00/15] Btrfs: Cleanup for raid56 scrib Zhaolei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 01/15] Btrfs: fix a out-of-bound access of raid_map Zhaolei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 02/15] Btrfs: sort raid_map before adding tgtdev stripes Zhaolei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 03/15] Btrfs: Make raid_map array be inlined in btrfs_bio structure Zhaolei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 04/15] Btrfs: add ref_count and free function for btrfs_bio Zhaolei
2015-01-15 12:52 ` David Sterba
2015-01-16 1:38 ` Zhao Lei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 05/15] Btrfs: Fix a jump typo of nodatasum_case to avoid wrong WARN_ON() Zhaolei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 06/15] Btrfs: Remove noneed force_write in scrub_write_block_to_dev_replace Zhaolei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 07/15] Btrfs: Cleanup btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked() Zhaolei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 08/15] Btrfs: btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked(): Use wait_event() Zhaolei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 09/15] Btrfs: Break loop when reach BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS in scrub_setup_recheck_block() Zhaolei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 10/15] Btrfs: Avoid trustless page-level-repair in dev-replace Zhaolei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 11/15] Btrfs: Separate finding-right-mirror and writing-to-target's process in scrub_handle_errored_block() Zhaolei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 12/15] Btrfs: Combine per-page recover in dev-replace and scrub Zhaolei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 13/15] Btrfs: Simplify scrub_setup_recheck_block()'s argument Zhaolei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 14/15] Btrfs: Include map_type in raid_bio Zhaolei
2015-01-13 12:34 ` Zhaolei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1421152488-30548-16-git-send-email-zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).