From: Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: btrfs raid1 and btrfs raid10 arrays NOT REDUNDANT
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 22:28:03 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1422900.iO9oO96QZb@quad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAVQaYBZS87S7XNdDpUv5pBMvqF0+th34H8PjSLVLtZV9LOR=Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 609 bytes --]
On Sat, 4 Jan 2014 12:57:02 AM Dave wrote:
> I find myself annoyed by the constant disclaimers I
> read on this list, about the experimental status of Btrfs, but it's
> apparent that this hasn't sunk in for everyone.
Btrfs will no longer marked as experimental in the kernel as of 3.13.
Unless someone submits a patch to fix it first. :-)
Can we also keep things polite here please.
thanks,
Chris
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic.
For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 482 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-04 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-03 22:28 btrfs raid1 and btrfs raid10 arrays NOT REDUNDANT Jim Salter
2014-01-03 22:42 ` Emil Karlson
2014-01-03 22:43 ` Joshua Schüler
2014-01-03 22:56 ` Jim Salter
2014-01-03 23:04 ` Hugo Mills
2014-01-03 23:04 ` Joshua Schüler
2014-01-03 23:13 ` Jim Salter
2014-01-03 23:18 ` Hugo Mills
2014-01-03 23:25 ` Jim Salter
2014-01-03 23:32 ` Chris Murphy
2014-01-03 23:22 ` Chris Murphy
2014-01-04 6:10 ` Duncan
2014-01-04 11:20 ` Chris Samuel
2014-01-04 13:03 ` Duncan
2014-01-04 14:51 ` Chris Mason
2014-01-04 15:23 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-01-04 20:08 ` Duncan
2014-01-04 21:22 ` Jim Salter
2014-01-05 11:01 ` Duncan
2014-01-03 23:19 ` Chris Murphy
[not found] ` <CAOjFWZ7zC3=4oH6=SBZA+PhZMrSK1KjxoRN6L2vqd=GTBKKTQA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-01-03 23:42 ` Jim Salter
2014-01-03 23:45 ` Jim Salter
2014-01-04 0:27 ` Chris Murphy
2014-01-04 2:59 ` Jim Salter
2014-01-04 5:57 ` Dave
2014-01-04 11:28 ` Chris Samuel [this message]
2014-01-04 14:56 ` Chris Mason
2014-01-05 9:20 ` Chris Samuel
2014-01-05 11:16 ` Duncan
2014-01-04 19:18 ` Chris Murphy
2014-01-04 21:16 ` Jim Salter
2014-01-05 20:25 ` Chris Murphy
2014-01-06 10:20 ` Chris Samuel
2014-01-06 18:30 ` Chris Murphy
2014-01-06 19:25 ` Jim Salter
2014-01-06 22:05 ` Chris Murphy
2014-01-06 22:24 ` Jim Salter
2014-01-07 5:43 ` Chris Samuel
2014-01-06 19:31 ` correct way to rollback a root filesystem? Jim Salter
2014-01-07 11:55 ` Sander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1422900.iO9oO96QZb@quad \
--to=chris@csamuel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox