From: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/7] Revert "Btrfs: incremental send, remove dead code"
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:39:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435055991-10109-2-git-send-email-robbieko@synology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435055991-10109-1-git-send-email-robbieko@synology.com>
This reverts commit 5f806c3ae2ff6263a10a6901f97abb74dac03d36.
This is a necessary patch for a subsequent patch in the series (patch 3).
"[PATCH] Btrfs: incremental send, don't delay directory renames
unnecessarily" changes behavior of wait_for_parent_move function.
It may cause path loop problem, so fix it in the patch 3.
Example:
Parent snapshot:
|---- @tmp/ (ino 257)
|---- pre/ (ino 260)
|---- wait_dir (ino 261)
|---- ance/ (ino 263)
|---- wait_at_below_ance/ (ino 259)
|---- desc/ (ino 262)
|---- other_dir/ (ino 264)
Send snapshot:
|---- @tmp/ (ino 257)
|---- other_dir/ (ino 264)
|---- wait_at_below_ance/ (ino 259)
|---- pre/ (ino 260)
|---- wait_dir/ (ino 261)
|---- desc/ (ino 262)
|---- ance/ (ino 263)
This cause will cause path building loop like this : 261 -> 260 -> 259 ->
263 -> 262 -> 261
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
---
V3: modify comment
fs/btrfs/send.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c
index 1c1f161..257753b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/send.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c
@@ -3080,6 +3080,48 @@ static struct pending_dir_move *get_pending_dir_moves(struct send_ctx *sctx,
return NULL;
}
+static int path_loop(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct fs_path *name,
+ u64 ino, u64 gen, u64 *ancestor_ino)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ u64 parent_inode = 0;
+ u64 parent_gen = 0;
+ u64 start_ino = ino;
+
+ *ancestor_ino = 0;
+ while (ino != BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID) {
+ fs_path_reset(name);
+
+ if (is_waiting_for_rm(sctx, ino))
+ break;
+ if (is_waiting_for_move(sctx, ino)) {
+ if (*ancestor_ino == 0)
+ *ancestor_ino = ino;
+ ret = get_first_ref(sctx->parent_root, ino,
+ &parent_inode, &parent_gen, name);
+ } else {
+ ret = __get_cur_name_and_parent(sctx, ino, gen,
+ &parent_inode,
+ &parent_gen, name);
+ if (ret > 0) {
+ ret = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (ret < 0)
+ break;
+ if (parent_inode == start_ino) {
+ ret = 1;
+ if (*ancestor_ino == 0)
+ *ancestor_ino = ino;
+ break;
+ }
+ ino = parent_inode;
+ gen = parent_gen;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int apply_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct pending_dir_move *pm)
{
struct fs_path *from_path = NULL;
@@ -3091,6 +3133,7 @@ static int apply_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct pending_dir_move *pm)
struct waiting_dir_move *dm = NULL;
u64 rmdir_ino = 0;
int ret;
+ u64 ancestor = 0;
name = fs_path_alloc();
from_path = fs_path_alloc();
@@ -3122,6 +3165,22 @@ static int apply_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct pending_dir_move *pm)
goto out;
sctx->send_progress = sctx->cur_ino + 1;
+ ret = path_loop(sctx, name, pm->ino, pm->gen, &ancestor);
+ if (ret) {
+ LIST_HEAD(deleted_refs);
+ ASSERT(ancestor > BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID);
+ ret = add_pending_dir_move(sctx, pm->ino, pm->gen, ancestor,
+ &pm->update_refs, &deleted_refs,
+ pm->is_orphan);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto out;
+ if (rmdir_ino) {
+ dm = get_waiting_dir_move(sctx, pm->ino);
+ ASSERT(dm);
+ dm->rmdir_ino = rmdir_ino;
+ }
+ goto out;
+ }
fs_path_reset(name);
to_path = name;
name = NULL;
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-23 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-23 10:39 [PATCH v3 0/7] Btrfs incremental send fix serval case for rename and rm directory Robbie Ko
2015-06-23 10:39 ` Robbie Ko [this message]
2015-06-23 15:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] Revert "Btrfs: incremental send, remove dead code" Filipe David Manana
2015-06-23 15:24 ` David Sterba
2015-06-23 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] Btrfs: incremental send, avoid circular waiting and descendant overwrite ancestor need to update path Robbie Ko
2015-06-23 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] Btrfs: incremental send, avoid ancestor rename to descendant Robbie Ko
2015-06-23 15:05 ` Filipe David Manana
2015-06-23 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] Btrfs: incremental send, fix orphan_dir_info leak Robbie Ko
2015-06-23 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] Btrfs: incremental send, fix rmdir but dir have a unprocess item Robbie Ko
2015-06-23 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] Btrfs: incremental send, don't send utimes for non-existing directory Robbie Ko
2015-06-23 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] Btrfs: incremental send, avoid the overhead of allocating an orphan_dir_info object unnecessarily Robbie Ko
2015-06-23 14:52 ` David Sterba
2015-06-23 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Btrfs incremental send fix serval case for rename and rm directory Filipe David Manana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1435055991-10109-2-git-send-email-robbieko@synology.com \
--to=robbieko@synology.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox