[PATCH 0/2] Btrfs-progs: device delete to accept devid

[PATCH 0/2] Btrfs-progs: device delete to accept devid

[Anand Jain]

This is btrfs-progs side of the patch.
Kernel patch is
   Btrfs: device delete by devid

Anand Jain (2):
  btrfs-progs: move is_numerical to utils-lib.h and make it non static
  btrfs-progs: device delete to accept devid

 Documentation/btrfs-device.asciidoc |  2 +-
 cmds-device.c                       | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 cmds-replace.c                      | 11 ---------
 ioctl.h                             |  8 +++++++
 utils-lib.c                         | 11 +++++++++
 utils.h                             |  1 +
 6 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

-- 
2.4.1

[PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: move is_numerical to utils-lib.h and make it non static

[Anand Jain]

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
 cmds-replace.c | 11 -----------
 utils-lib.c    | 11 +++++++++++
 utils.h        |  1 +
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cmds-replace.c b/cmds-replace.c
index 85365e3..e6a27e3 100644
--- a/cmds-replace.c
+++ b/cmds-replace.c
@@ -65,17 +65,6 @@ static const char * const replace_cmd_group_usage[] = {
 	NULL
 };
 
-static int is_numerical(const char *str)
-{
-	if (!(*str >= '0' && *str <= '9'))
-		return 0;
-	while (*str >= '0' && *str <= '9')
-		str++;
-	if (*str != '\0')
-		return 0;
-	return 1;
-}
-
 static int dev_replace_cancel_fd = -1;
 static void dev_replace_sigint_handler(int signal)
 {
diff --git a/utils-lib.c b/utils-lib.c
index 79ef35e..9ac0b7b 100644
--- a/utils-lib.c
+++ b/utils-lib.c
@@ -38,3 +38,14 @@ u64 arg_strtou64(const char *str)
 	}
 	return value;
 }
+
+int is_numerical(const char *str)
+{
+	if (!(*str >= '0' && *str <= '9'))
+		return 0;
+	while (*str >= '0' && *str <= '9')
+		str++;
+	if (*str != '\0')
+		return 0;
+	return 1;
+}
diff --git a/utils.h b/utils.h
index 94606ed..0975301 100644
--- a/utils.h
+++ b/utils.h
@@ -243,5 +243,6 @@ int btrfs_tree_search2_ioctl_supported(int fd);
 int btrfs_check_nodesize(u32 nodesize, u32 sectorsize);
 
 const char *get_argv0_buf(void);
+int is_numerical(const char *str);
 
 #endif
-- 
2.4.1

[PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: device delete to accept devid

[Anand Jain]

This patch introduces new option <devid> for the command

  btrfs device delete <device_path|devid>[..]  <mnt>

In a user reported issue on a 3-disk-RAID1, one disk failed with its
SB unreadable. Now with this patch user will have a choice to delete
the device using devid.

The other method we could do, is to match the input device_path
to the available device_paths with in the kernel. But that won't
work in all the cases, like what if user provided mapper path
when the path within the kernel is a non-mapper path.

This patch depends on the below kernel patch for the new feature to work,
however it will fail-back to the old interface for the kernel without the
patch

  Btrfs: device delete by devid

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
 Documentation/btrfs-device.asciidoc |  2 +-
 cmds-device.c                       | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 ioctl.h                             |  8 +++++++
 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/btrfs-device.asciidoc b/Documentation/btrfs-device.asciidoc
index 2827598..61ede6e 100644
--- a/Documentation/btrfs-device.asciidoc
+++ b/Documentation/btrfs-device.asciidoc
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ do not perform discard by default
 -f|--force::::
 force overwrite of existing filesystem on the given disk(s)
 
-*remove* <dev> [<dev>...] <path>::
+*remove* <dev>|<devid> [<dev>|<devid>...] <path>::
 Remove device(s) from a filesystem identified by <path>.
 
 *delete* <dev> [<dev>...] <path>::
diff --git a/cmds-device.c b/cmds-device.c
index 0e60500..eb4358d 100644
--- a/cmds-device.c
+++ b/cmds-device.c
@@ -164,16 +164,34 @@ static int _cmd_rm_dev(int argc, char **argv, const char * const *usagestr)
 		struct	btrfs_ioctl_vol_args arg;
 		int	res;
 
-		if (!is_block_device(argv[i])) {
+		struct  btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v3 argv3 = {0};
+		int     its_num = false;
+
+		if (is_numerical(argv[i])) {
+			argv3.devid = arg_strtou64(argv[i]);
+			its_num = true;
+		} else if (is_block_device(argv[i])) {
+			strncpy_null(argv3.name, argv[i]);
+		} else {
 			fprintf(stderr,
-				"ERROR: %s is not a block device\n", argv[i]);
+				"ERROR: %s is not a block device or devid\n", argv[i]);
 			ret++;
 			continue;
 		}
-		memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg));
-		strncpy_null(arg.name, argv[i]);
-		res = ioctl(fdmnt, BTRFS_IOC_RM_DEV, &arg);
+		res = ioctl(fdmnt, BTRFS_IOC_RM_DEV_V2, &argv3);
 		e = errno;
+		if (res && e == ENOTTY) {
+			if (its_num) {
+				fprintf(stderr,
+				"Error: Kernel does not support delete by devid\n");
+				ret = 1;
+				continue;
+			}
+			memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg));
+			strncpy_null(arg.name, argv[i]);
+			res = ioctl(fdmnt, BTRFS_IOC_RM_DEV, &arg);
+			e = errno;
+		}
 		if (res) {
 			const char *msg;
 
@@ -181,9 +199,16 @@ static int _cmd_rm_dev(int argc, char **argv, const char * const *usagestr)
 				msg = btrfs_err_str(res);
 			else
 				msg = strerror(e);
-			fprintf(stderr,
-				"ERROR: error removing the device '%s' - %s\n",
-				argv[i], msg);
+
+			if (its_num)
+				fprintf(stderr,
+					"ERROR: error removing the devid '%llu' - %s\n",
+					argv3.devid, msg);
+			else
+				fprintf(stderr,
+					"ERROR: error removing the device '%s' - %s\n",
+					argv[i], msg);
+
 			ret++;
 		}
 	}
@@ -193,7 +218,7 @@ static int _cmd_rm_dev(int argc, char **argv, const char * const *usagestr)
 }
 
 static const char * const cmd_rm_dev_usage[] = {
-	"btrfs device remove <device> [<device>...] <path>",
+	"btrfs device remove <device>|<devid> [<device>|<devid>...] <path>",
 	"Remove a device from a filesystem",
 	NULL
 };
@@ -204,7 +229,7 @@ static int cmd_rm_dev(int argc, char **argv)
 }
 
 static const char * const cmd_del_dev_usage[] = {
-	"btrfs device delete <device> [<device>...] <path>",
+	"btrfs device delete <device>|<devid> [<device>|<devid>...] <path>",
 	"Remove a device from a filesystem",
 	NULL
 };
diff --git a/ioctl.h b/ioctl.h
index dff015a..6870931 100644
--- a/ioctl.h
+++ b/ioctl.h
@@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args {
 	char name[BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX + 1];
 };
 
+struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v3 {
+	__s64 fd;
+	char name[BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX + 1];
+	__u64 devid;
+};
+
 #define BTRFS_DEVICE_PATH_NAME_MAX 1024
 
 #define BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ASYNC	(1ULL << 0)
@@ -683,6 +689,8 @@ static inline char *btrfs_err_str(enum btrfs_err_code err_code)
                                   struct btrfs_ioctl_feature_flags[2])
 #define BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES _IOR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 57, \
                                   struct btrfs_ioctl_feature_flags[3])
+#define BTRFS_IOC_RM_DEV_V2	_IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 58, \
+				   struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v3)
 #ifdef __cplusplus
 }
 #endif
-- 
2.4.1

Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: device delete to accept devid

[Goffredo Baroncelli]

On 2015-08-14 12:36, Anand Jain wrote:
> This patch introduces new option <devid> for the command
> 
>   btrfs device delete <device_path|devid>[..]  <mnt>
> 
> In a user reported issue on a 3-disk-RAID1, one disk failed with its
> SB unreadable. Now with this patch user will have a choice to delete
> the device using devid.
> 
> The other method we could do, is to match the input device_path
> to the available device_paths with in the kernel. But that won't
> work in all the cases, like what if user provided mapper path
> when the path within the kernel is a non-mapper path.
> 
> This patch depends on the below kernel patch for the new feature to work,
> however it will fail-back to the old interface for the kernel without the
> patch
> 
>   Btrfs: device delete by devid
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/btrfs-device.asciidoc |  2 +-
>  cmds-device.c                       | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  ioctl.h                             |  8 +++++++
>  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/btrfs-device.asciidoc b/Documentation/btrfs-device.asciidoc
> index 2827598..61ede6e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/btrfs-device.asciidoc
> +++ b/Documentation/btrfs-device.asciidoc
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ do not perform discard by default
>  -f|--force::::
>  force overwrite of existing filesystem on the given disk(s)
>  
> -*remove* <dev> [<dev>...] <path>::
> +*remove* <dev>|<devid> [<dev>|<devid>...] <path>::
>  Remove device(s) from a filesystem identified by <path>.
>  
>  *delete* <dev> [<dev>...] <path>::
also here is missing <devid> (below you added)

> diff --git a/cmds-device.c b/cmds-device.c
> index 0e60500..eb4358d 100644
> --- a/cmds-device.c
> +++ b/cmds-device.c
> @@ -164,16 +164,34 @@ static int _cmd_rm_dev(int argc, char **argv, const char * const *usagestr)
>  		struct	btrfs_ioctl_vol_args arg;
>  		int	res;
>  
> -		if (!is_block_device(argv[i])) {
> +		struct  btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v3 argv3 = {0};
> +		int     its_num = false;
> +
> +		if (is_numerical(argv[i])) {
> +			argv3.devid = arg_strtou64(argv[i]);
> +			its_num = true;
> +		} else if (is_block_device(argv[i])) {
> +			strncpy_null(argv3.name, argv[i]);
> +		} else {
>  			fprintf(stderr,
> -				"ERROR: %s is not a block device\n", argv[i]);
> +				"ERROR: %s is not a block device or devid\n", argv[i]);
>  			ret++;
>  			continue;
>  		}
> -		memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg));
> -		strncpy_null(arg.name, argv[i]);
> -		res = ioctl(fdmnt, BTRFS_IOC_RM_DEV, &arg);
> +		res = ioctl(fdmnt, BTRFS_IOC_RM_DEV_V2, &argv3);
>  		e = errno;
> +		if (res && e == ENOTTY) {
> +			if (its_num) {
> +				fprintf(stderr,
> +				"Error: Kernel does not support delete by devid\n");
> +				ret = 1;
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +			memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg));
> +			strncpy_null(arg.name, argv[i]);
> +			res = ioctl(fdmnt, BTRFS_IOC_RM_DEV, &arg);
> +			e = errno;
> +		}
>  		if (res) {
>  			const char *msg;
>  
> @@ -181,9 +199,16 @@ static int _cmd_rm_dev(int argc, char **argv, const char * const *usagestr)
>  				msg = btrfs_err_str(res);
>  			else
>  				msg = strerror(e);
> -			fprintf(stderr,
> -				"ERROR: error removing the device '%s' - %s\n",
> -				argv[i], msg);
> +
> +			if (its_num)
> +				fprintf(stderr,
> +					"ERROR: error removing the devid '%llu' - %s\n",
> +					argv3.devid, msg);
> +			else
> +				fprintf(stderr,
> +					"ERROR: error removing the device '%s' - %s\n",
> +					argv[i], msg);
> +
>  			ret++;
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -193,7 +218,7 @@ static int _cmd_rm_dev(int argc, char **argv, const char * const *usagestr)
>  }
>  
>  static const char * const cmd_rm_dev_usage[] = {
> -	"btrfs device remove <device> [<device>...] <path>",
> +	"btrfs device remove <device>|<devid> [<device>|<devid>...] <path>",
>  	"Remove a device from a filesystem",
>  	NULL
>  };
> @@ -204,7 +229,7 @@ static int cmd_rm_dev(int argc, char **argv)
>  }
>  
>  static const char * const cmd_del_dev_usage[] = {
> -	"btrfs device delete <device> [<device>...] <path>",
> +	"btrfs device delete <device>|<devid> [<device>|<devid>...] <path>",
>  	"Remove a device from a filesystem",
>  	NULL
>  };
> diff --git a/ioctl.h b/ioctl.h
> index dff015a..6870931 100644
> --- a/ioctl.h
> +++ b/ioctl.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args {
>  	char name[BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX + 1];
>  };
>  
> +struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v3 {
> +	__s64 fd;
> +	char name[BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX + 1];
> +	__u64 devid;
> +};
> +
>  #define BTRFS_DEVICE_PATH_NAME_MAX 1024
>  
>  #define BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ASYNC	(1ULL << 0)
> @@ -683,6 +689,8 @@ static inline char *btrfs_err_str(enum btrfs_err_code err_code)
>                                    struct btrfs_ioctl_feature_flags[2])
>  #define BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES _IOR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 57, \
>                                    struct btrfs_ioctl_feature_flags[3])
> +#define BTRFS_IOC_RM_DEV_V2	_IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 58, \
> +				   struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v3)
>  #ifdef __cplusplus
>  }
>  #endif
> 


-- 
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D  17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5

Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: device delete to accept devid

[Anand Jain]

>>
>> -*remove* <dev> [<dev>...] <path>::
>> +*remove* <dev>|<devid> [<dev>|<devid>...] <path>::
>>   Remove device(s) from a filesystem identified by <path>.
>>
>>   *delete* <dev> [<dev>...] <path>::
> also here is missing <devid> (below you added)

  Thank you. Got this fixed.

Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: device delete to accept devid

[Goffredo Baroncelli]

Hi Anand
On 2015-08-14 12:36, Anand Jain wrote:
> This patch introduces new option <devid> for the command
> 
[...]

> +
> +		if (is_numerical(argv[i])) {
> +			argv3.devid = arg_strtou64(argv[i]);
> +			its_num = true;
> +		} else if (is_block_device(argv[i])) {


please be aware that is_block_device(), returns 
- 1 if the file is a block device, 
- < 0 in case of an error (eg: file not found)
- 0 otherwise

so I suggest to change the check in

 +		} else if (is_block_device(argv[i]) == 1) {

[...]


-- 
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D  17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5

Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: device delete to accept devid

[Anand Jain]

Hi Goffredo,

  sorry to have missed this.


On 08/20/2015 07:29 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> Hi Anand
> On 2015-08-14 12:36, Anand Jain wrote:
>> This patch introduces new option <devid> for the command
>>
> [...]
>
>> +
>> +		if (is_numerical(argv[i])) {
>> +			argv3.devid = arg_strtou64(argv[i]);
>> +			its_num = true;
>> +		} else if (is_block_device(argv[i])) {
>
>
> please be aware that is_block_device(), returns
> - 1 if the file is a block device,
> - < 0 in case of an error (eg: file not found)
> - 0 otherwise
>
> so I suggest to change the check in
>
>   +		} else if (is_block_device(argv[i]) == 1) {
>
> [...]
>

oh yes. I didn't notice that.

In fact everywhere we didn't check the return properly.
I wrote a new patch to fix this.

Thanks, Anand

Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: device delete to accept devid

[Goffredo Baroncelli]

On 2015-08-28 16:17, Anand Jain wrote:
> 
> Hi Goffredo,
> 
>  sorry to have missed this.
> 
[...]
> 
> In fact everywhere we didn't check the return properly.
> I wrote a new patch to fix this.
> 
> Thanks, Anand

Many thanks for your work

BR
Goffredo


-- 
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D  17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5

Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: device delete to accept devid

[Goffredo Baroncelli]

On 2015-08-28 16:17, Anand Jain wrote:
> 
> Hi Goffredo,
> 
>  sorry to have missed this.
> 
[...]
> 
> In fact everywhere we didn't check the return properly.
> I wrote a new patch to fix this.
> 
> Thanks, Anand

Many thanks for your work

BR
Goffredo


-- 
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D  17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5