linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Btrfs: Per-chunk degradable check
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:10:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442801443-5132-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)

Btrfs currently uses num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures to do global
check for tolerated missing device.

Although the one-size-fit-all solution is quite safe, it's too strict if
data and metadata has different duplication level.

For example, if one use Single data and RAID1 metadata for 2 disks, it
means any missing device will make the fs unable to be degraded mounted.

But in fact, some times all single chunks may be in the existing device
and in that case, we should allow it to be rw degraded mounted.

Such case can be easily reproduced using the following script:
 # mkfs.btrfs -f -m raid1 -d sing /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
 # wipefs -f /dev/sdc
 # mount /dev/sdb -o degraded,rw

If using btrfs-debug-tree to check /dev/sdb, one should find that the
data chunk is only in sdb, so in fact it should allow degraded mount.

This patchset will introduce a new per-chunk degradable check for btrfs,
allow above case to succeed, and it's quite small anyway.

Also, it provides the possibility for later enhancement, like
automatically add 'degraded' mount option if possible.

Cc: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>

Qu Wenruo (5):
  btrfs: Introduce a new function to check if all chunks a OK for
    degraded     mount
  btrfs: Do per-chunk check for mount time check
  btrfs: Do per-chunk degraded check for remount
  btrfs: Allow barrier_all_devices to do per-chunk device check
  btrfs: Cleanup num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures

 fs/btrfs/ctree.h   |  2 --
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 87 ++++++++++--------------------------------------------
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.h |  2 --
 fs/btrfs/super.c   | 11 ++++---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 fs/btrfs/volumes.h |  5 ++++
 6 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)

-- 
2.5.2


             reply	other threads:[~2015-09-21  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-21  2:10 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2015-09-21  2:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] btrfs: Introduce a new function to check if all chunks a OK for degraded mount Qu Wenruo
2016-04-18  8:47   ` [PATCH] btrfs: fix btrfs_check_degradable() to free extent map Anand Jain
2015-09-21  2:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] btrfs: Do per-chunk check for mount time check Qu Wenruo
2015-09-25  7:05   ` Anand Jain
2015-09-21  2:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] btrfs: Do per-chunk degraded check for remount Qu Wenruo
2015-09-25  6:54   ` Anand Jain
2015-09-25  8:08     ` Qu Wenruo
2015-09-25  8:30       ` Anand Jain
2015-09-25  8:34         ` Qu Wenruo
2015-09-25  8:24   ` [PATCH 1/1] " Anand Jain
2015-09-21  2:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] btrfs: Allow barrier_all_devices to do per-chunk device check Qu Wenruo
2015-10-30  8:32   ` Anand Jain
2015-10-30 11:41     ` Qu Wenruo
2015-10-30 23:52       ` Anand Jain
2015-09-21  2:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: Cleanup num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures Qu Wenruo
2015-11-05  0:57 ` [PATCH 0/5] Btrfs: Per-chunk degradable check Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1442801443-5132-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).