From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] btrfs: Introduce a new function to check if all chunks a OK for degraded mount
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:10:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442801443-5132-2-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442801443-5132-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Introduce a new function, btrfs_check_degradable(), to judge if all
chunks in btrfs is OK for degraded mount.
It provides the new basis for accurate btrfs mount/remount and even
runtime degraded mount check other than old one-size-fit-all method.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 644e070..f1ef215 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -6906,3 +6906,66 @@ void btrfs_reset_fs_info_ptr(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
fs_devices = fs_devices->seed;
}
}
+
+/*
+ * Check if all chunks in the fs is OK for degraded mount
+ * Caller itself should do extra check if DEGRADED mount option is given
+ * for >0 return value.
+ *
+ * Return 0 if all chunks are OK.
+ * Return >0 if all chunks are degradable but not all OK.
+ * Return <0 if any chunk is not degradable or other bug.
+ */
+int btrfs_check_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, unsigned flags)
+{
+ struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
+ struct extent_map *em;
+ u64 next_start = 0;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (flags & MS_RDONLY)
+ return 0;
+
+ read_lock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
+ em = lookup_extent_mapping(&map_tree->map_tree, 0, (u64)(-1));
+ /* No any chunk? Should be a huge bug */
+ if (!em) {
+ ret = -ENOENT;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ while (em) {
+ struct map_lookup *map;
+ int missing = 0;
+ int max_tolerated;
+ int i;
+
+ map = (struct map_lookup *) em->bdev;
+ max_tolerated =
+ btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(
+ map->type);
+ for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
+ if (map->stripes[i].dev->missing)
+ missing++;
+ }
+ if (missing > max_tolerated) {
+ ret = -EIO;
+ btrfs_warn(fs_info,
+ "missing devices(%d) exceeds the limit(%d), writebale mount is not allowed",
+ missing, max_tolerated);
+ goto out;
+ } else if (missing)
+ ret = 1;
+ next_start = extent_map_end(em);
+
+ /*
+ * Alwasy search range [next_start, (u64)-1) to find the next
+ * chunk map
+ */
+ em = lookup_extent_mapping(&map_tree->map_tree, next_start,
+ (u64)(-1) - next_start);
+ }
+out:
+ read_unlock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
+ return ret;
+}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index 2ca784a..fe758df 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -547,5 +547,6 @@ static inline void unlock_chunks(struct btrfs_root *root)
struct list_head *btrfs_get_fs_uuids(void);
void btrfs_set_fs_info_ptr(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
void btrfs_reset_fs_info_ptr(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
+int btrfs_check_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, unsigned flags);
#endif
--
2.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-21 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-21 2:10 [PATCH 0/5] Btrfs: Per-chunk degradable check Qu Wenruo
2015-09-21 2:10 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2016-04-18 8:47 ` [PATCH] btrfs: fix btrfs_check_degradable() to free extent map Anand Jain
2015-09-21 2:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] btrfs: Do per-chunk check for mount time check Qu Wenruo
2015-09-25 7:05 ` Anand Jain
2015-09-21 2:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] btrfs: Do per-chunk degraded check for remount Qu Wenruo
2015-09-25 6:54 ` Anand Jain
2015-09-25 8:08 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-09-25 8:30 ` Anand Jain
2015-09-25 8:34 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-09-25 8:24 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Anand Jain
2015-09-21 2:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] btrfs: Allow barrier_all_devices to do per-chunk device check Qu Wenruo
2015-10-30 8:32 ` Anand Jain
2015-10-30 11:41 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-10-30 23:52 ` Anand Jain
2015-09-21 2:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: Cleanup num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures Qu Wenruo
2015-11-05 0:57 ` [PATCH 0/5] Btrfs: Per-chunk degradable check Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1442801443-5132-2-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).