From: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
jbacik@fb.com, clm@fb.com, bo.li.liu@oracle.com, dsterba@suse.cz,
quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com, chandan@mykolab.com
Subject: [PATCH V5 01/13] Btrfs: __btrfs_buffered_write: Reserve/release extents aligned to block size
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:58:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1443608912-31667-2-git-send-email-chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443608912-31667-1-git-send-email-chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Currently, the code reserves/releases extents in multiples of PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
units. Fix this by doing reservation/releases in block size units.
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index b823fac..12ce401 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ int btrfs_dirty_pages(struct btrfs_root *root, struct inode *inode,
loff_t isize = i_size_read(inode);
start_pos = pos & ~((u64)root->sectorsize - 1);
- num_bytes = ALIGN(write_bytes + pos - start_pos, root->sectorsize);
+ num_bytes = round_up(write_bytes + pos - start_pos, root->sectorsize);
end_of_last_block = start_pos + num_bytes - 1;
err = btrfs_set_extent_delalloc(inode, start_pos, end_of_last_block,
@@ -1362,16 +1362,19 @@ fail:
static noinline int
lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(struct inode *inode, struct page **pages,
size_t num_pages, loff_t pos,
+ size_t write_bytes,
u64 *lockstart, u64 *lockend,
struct extent_state **cached_state)
{
+ struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
u64 start_pos;
u64 last_pos;
int i;
int ret = 0;
- start_pos = pos & ~((u64)PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
- last_pos = start_pos + ((u64)num_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) - 1;
+ start_pos = round_down(pos, root->sectorsize);
+ last_pos = start_pos
+ + round_up(pos + write_bytes - start_pos, root->sectorsize) - 1;
if (start_pos < inode->i_size) {
struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
@@ -1489,6 +1492,7 @@ static noinline ssize_t __btrfs_buffered_write(struct file *file,
while (iov_iter_count(i) > 0) {
size_t offset = pos & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
+ size_t sector_offset;
size_t write_bytes = min(iov_iter_count(i),
nrptrs * (size_t)PAGE_CACHE_SIZE -
offset);
@@ -1497,6 +1501,8 @@ static noinline ssize_t __btrfs_buffered_write(struct file *file,
size_t reserve_bytes;
size_t dirty_pages;
size_t copied;
+ size_t dirty_sectors;
+ size_t num_sectors;
WARN_ON(num_pages > nrptrs);
@@ -1509,8 +1515,12 @@ static noinline ssize_t __btrfs_buffered_write(struct file *file,
break;
}
- reserve_bytes = num_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+ sector_offset = pos & (root->sectorsize - 1);
+ reserve_bytes = round_up(write_bytes + sector_offset,
+ root->sectorsize);
+
ret = btrfs_check_data_free_space(inode, reserve_bytes, write_bytes);
+
if (ret == -ENOSPC &&
(BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & (BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW |
BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC))) {
@@ -1523,7 +1533,10 @@ static noinline ssize_t __btrfs_buffered_write(struct file *file,
*/
num_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(write_bytes + offset,
PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
- reserve_bytes = num_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+ reserve_bytes = round_up(write_bytes
+ + sector_offset,
+ root->sectorsize);
+
ret = 0;
} else {
ret = -ENOSPC;
@@ -1558,8 +1571,8 @@ again:
break;
ret = lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(inode, pages, num_pages,
- pos, &lockstart, &lockend,
- &cached_state);
+ pos, write_bytes, &lockstart,
+ &lockend, &cached_state);
if (ret < 0) {
if (ret == -EAGAIN)
goto again;
@@ -1595,9 +1608,14 @@ again:
* we still have an outstanding extent for the chunk we actually
* managed to copy.
*/
- if (num_pages > dirty_pages) {
- release_bytes = (num_pages - dirty_pages) <<
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+ num_sectors = reserve_bytes >> inode->i_blkbits;
+ dirty_sectors = round_up(copied + sector_offset,
+ root->sectorsize);
+ dirty_sectors >>= inode->i_blkbits;
+
+ if (num_sectors > dirty_sectors) {
+ release_bytes = (write_bytes - copied)
+ & ~((u64)root->sectorsize - 1);
if (copied > 0) {
spin_lock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
BTRFS_I(inode)->outstanding_extents++;
@@ -1611,7 +1629,8 @@ again:
release_bytes);
}
- release_bytes = dirty_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+ release_bytes = round_up(copied + sector_offset,
+ root->sectorsize);
if (copied > 0)
ret = btrfs_dirty_pages(root, inode, pages,
@@ -1632,8 +1651,7 @@ again:
if (only_release_metadata && copied > 0) {
lockstart = round_down(pos, root->sectorsize);
- lockend = lockstart +
- (dirty_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) - 1;
+ lockend = round_up(pos + copied, root->sectorsize) - 1;
set_extent_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lockstart,
lockend, EXTENT_NORESERVE, NULL,
--
2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-30 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-30 10:28 [PATCH V5 00/13] Btrfs: Pre subpagesize-blocksize cleanups Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-30 10:28 ` Chandan Rajendra [this message]
2015-10-01 14:37 ` [PATCH V5 01/13] Btrfs: __btrfs_buffered_write: Reserve/release extents aligned to block size Josef Bacik
2015-09-30 10:28 ` [PATCH V5 02/13] Btrfs: Compute and look up csums based on sectorsized blocks Chandan Rajendra
2015-10-01 14:39 ` Josef Bacik
2015-10-02 12:20 ` Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-30 10:28 ` [PATCH V5 03/13] Btrfs: Direct I/O read: Work " Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-30 10:28 ` [PATCH V5 04/13] Btrfs: fallocate: Work with " Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-30 10:28 ` [PATCH V5 05/13] Btrfs: btrfs_page_mkwrite: Reserve space in sectorsized units Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-30 10:28 ` [PATCH V5 06/13] Btrfs: Search for all ordered extents that could span across a page Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-30 10:28 ` [PATCH V5 07/13] Btrfs: Use (eb->start, seq) as search key for tree modification log Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-30 10:28 ` [PATCH V5 08/13] Btrfs: btrfs_submit_direct_hook: Handle map_length < bio vector length Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-30 10:28 ` [PATCH V5 09/13] Btrfs: Limit inline extents to root->sectorsize Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-30 10:28 ` [PATCH V5 10/13] Btrfs: Fix block size returned to user space Chandan Rajendra
2015-10-01 14:58 ` Josef Bacik
2015-09-30 10:28 ` [PATCH V5 11/13] Btrfs: Clean pte corresponding to page straddling i_size Chandan Rajendra
2015-10-01 14:57 ` Josef Bacik
2015-10-02 16:34 ` Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-30 10:28 ` [PATCH V5 12/13] Btrfs: prepare_pages: Retry adding a page to the page cache Chandan Rajendra
2015-10-01 14:50 ` Josef Bacik
2015-10-02 12:24 ` Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-30 10:28 ` [PATCH V5 13/13] Btrfs: Return valid delalloc range when the page does not have PG_Dirty flag set or has been invalidated Chandan Rajendra
2015-10-01 14:48 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1443608912-31667-2-git-send-email-chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=chandan@mykolab.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).