linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: statfs: report zero available if metadata are exhausted
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:59:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444492793-18228-1-git-send-email-dsterba@suse.com> (raw)

There is one ENOSPC case that's very confusing. There's Available
greater than zero but no file operation succeds (besides removing
files). This happens when the metadata are exhausted and there's no
possibility to allocate another chunk.

In this scenario it's normal that there's still some space in the data
chunk and the calculation in df reflects that in the Avail value.

To at least give some clue about the ENOSPC situation, let statfs report
zero value in Avail, even if there's still data space available.

Current:
  /dev/sdb1             4.0G  3.3G  719M  83% /mnt/test

New:
  /dev/sdb1             4.0G  3.3G     0 100% /mnt/test

We calculate the remaining metadata space minus global reserve. If this
is (supposedly) smaller than zero, there's no space. But this does not
hold in practice, the exhausted state happens where's still some
positive delta. So we apply some guesswork and compare the delta to a 4M
threshold. (Practically observed delta was 2M.)

We probably cannot calculate the exact threshold value because this
depends on the internal reservations requested by various operations, so
some operations that consume a few metadata will succeed even if the
Avail is zero. But this is better than the other way around.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/super.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 11d1eab9234d..ea76a0272b01 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -1943,6 +1943,8 @@ static int btrfs_calc_avail_data_space(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 *free_bytes)
  * there are other factors that may change the result (like a new metadata
  * chunk).
  *
+ * If metadata is exhausted, f_bavail will be 0.
+ *
  * FIXME: not accurate for mixed block groups, total and free/used are ok,
  * available appears slightly larger.
  */
@@ -1954,11 +1956,13 @@ static int btrfs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
 	struct btrfs_space_info *found;
 	u64 total_used = 0;
 	u64 total_free_data = 0;
+	u64 total_free_meta = 0;
 	int bits = dentry->d_sb->s_blocksize_bits;
 	__be32 *fsid = (__be32 *)fs_info->fsid;
 	unsigned factor = 1;
 	struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv = &fs_info->global_block_rsv;
 	int ret;
+	u64 thresh = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * holding chunk_muext to avoid allocating new chunks, holding
@@ -1984,6 +1988,8 @@ static int btrfs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
 				}
 			}
 		}
+		if (found->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA)
+			total_free_meta += found->disk_total - found->disk_used;
 
 		total_used += found->disk_used;
 	}
@@ -2006,6 +2012,24 @@ static int btrfs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
 	buf->f_bavail += div_u64(total_free_data, factor);
 	buf->f_bavail = buf->f_bavail >> bits;
 
+	/*
+	 * We calculate the remaining metadata space minus global reserve. If
+	 * this is (supposedly) smaller than zero, there's no space. But this
+	 * does not hold in practice, the exhausted state happens where's still
+	 * some positive delta. So we apply some guesswork and compare the
+	 * delta to a 4M threshold.  (Practically observed delta was ~2M.)
+	 *
+	 * We probably cannot calculate the exact threshold value because this
+	 * depends on the internal reservations requested by various
+	 * operations, so some operations that consume a few metadata will
+	 * succeed even if the Avail is zero. But this is better than the other
+	 * way around.
+	 */
+	thresh = 4 * 1024 * 1024;
+
+	if (total_free_meta - thresh < block_rsv->size)
+		buf->f_bavail = 0;
+
 	buf->f_type = BTRFS_SUPER_MAGIC;
 	buf->f_bsize = dentry->d_sb->s_blocksize;
 	buf->f_namelen = BTRFS_NAME_LEN;
-- 
1.8.4.5


                 reply	other threads:[~2015-10-10 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1444492793-18228-1-git-send-email-dsterba@suse.com \
    --to=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).