From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
To: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs: poor performance on deleting many large files
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 04:57:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448683025.6837.4.camel@scientia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan$34543$2ed1f043$2f803125$884b36c0@cox.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 422 bytes --]
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 03:38 +0000, Duncan wrote:
> AFAIK, per-subvolume *atime mounts should already be working.
Ah I see. :)
Still, specifically for snapshots that's a bit unhandy, as one
typically doesn't mount each of them... one rather mount e.g. the top
level subvol and has a subdir snapshots there...
So perhaps the idea of having snapshots that are per se noatime is
still not too bad.
Cheers,
Chris
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5313 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-28 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-23 1:43 btrfs: poor performance on deleting many large files Mitch Fossen
2015-11-23 6:29 ` Duncan
2015-11-25 21:49 ` Mitchell Fossen
2015-11-26 16:52 ` Duncan
2015-11-26 18:25 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-11-26 23:29 ` Duncan
2015-11-27 0:06 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-11-27 3:38 ` Duncan
2015-11-28 3:57 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer [this message]
2015-11-28 6:49 ` Duncan
2015-12-12 22:15 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-13 7:10 ` Duncan
2015-12-16 22:14 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-14 14:24 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2015-12-14 19:39 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-14 20:27 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2015-12-14 21:30 ` Lionel Bouton
2015-12-14 23:25 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-15 1:49 ` Duncan
2015-12-15 2:38 ` Lionel Bouton
2015-12-16 8:10 ` Duncan
2015-12-14 23:10 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-14 23:16 ` project idea: per-object default mount-options / more btrfs-properties / chattr attributes (was: btrfs: poor performance on deleting many large files) Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-15 2:08 ` btrfs: poor performance on deleting many large files Duncan
2015-12-15 4:05 ` Chris Murphy
2015-11-27 1:49 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-11-23 12:59 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-26 0:23 ` [auto-]defrag, nodatacow - general suggestions?(was: btrfs: poor performance on deleting many large files?) Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-11-26 0:33 ` Hugo Mills
2015-12-09 5:43 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-09 13:36 ` Duncan
2015-12-14 2:46 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-14 11:19 ` Duncan
2015-12-16 23:39 ` Kai Krakow
2015-12-14 1:44 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-14 10:51 ` Duncan
2015-12-16 23:55 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-11-26 23:08 ` Duncan
2015-12-09 5:45 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-09 16:36 ` Duncan
2015-12-16 21:59 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-17 4:06 ` Duncan
2015-12-18 0:21 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-17 4:35 ` Duncan
2015-12-17 5:07 ` Duncan
2015-12-17 5:12 ` Duncan
2015-12-17 6:00 ` Duncan
2015-12-17 6:01 ` Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448683025.6837.4.camel@scientia.net \
--to=calestyo@scientia.net \
--cc=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).