linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 04/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to check referencer of a backref
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:48:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461642543-4621-5-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461642543-4621-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>

From: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

Introduce a new function check_tree_block_backref() to check if a
backref points to correct referencer.

Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 cmds-check.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+)

diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c
index 6633b6e..81dd4f3 100644
--- a/cmds-check.c
+++ b/cmds-check.c
@@ -323,6 +323,8 @@ struct root_item_info {
 #define MISSING_BACKREF	(1 << 0) /* Completely no backref in extent tree */
 #define BAD_BACKREF	(1 << 1) /* Backref mismatch */
 #define UNALIGNED_BYTES	(1 << 2) /* Some bytes are not aligned */
+#define MISSING_REFERENCER (1 << 3) /* Referencer not found */
+#define BAD_REFERENCER	(1 << 4) /* Referencer found, but not mismatch */
 
 static void *print_status_check(void *p)
 {
@@ -8736,6 +8738,99 @@ out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Check if a tree block backref is valid (points to valid tree block)
+ * if level == -1, level will be resolved
+ */
+static int check_tree_block_backref(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 root_id,
+				    u64 bytenr, int level)
+{
+	struct btrfs_root *root;
+	struct btrfs_key key;
+	struct btrfs_path path;
+	struct extent_buffer *eb;
+	struct extent_buffer *node;
+	u32 nodesize = btrfs_super_nodesize(fs_info->super_copy);
+	int err = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Query level for level == -1 special case */
+	if (level == -1)
+		level = query_tree_block_level(fs_info, bytenr);
+	if (level < 0) {
+		err = MISSING_REFERENCER;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	key.objectid = root_id;
+	key.type = BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY;
+	key.offset = (u64)-1;
+
+	root = btrfs_read_fs_root(fs_info, &key);
+	if (IS_ERR(root)) {
+		err |= MISSING_REFERENCER;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* Read out the tree block to get item/node key */
+	eb = read_tree_block(root, bytenr, root->nodesize, 0);
+	/* Impossible, as tree block query has read out the tree block */
+	if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) {
+		err |= MISSING_REFERENCER;
+		free_extent_buffer(eb);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* Empty tree, no need to check key */
+	if (!btrfs_header_nritems(eb) && !level) {
+		free_extent_buffer(eb);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (level)
+		btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(eb, &key, 0);
+	else
+		btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &key, 0);
+
+	free_extent_buffer(eb);
+
+	btrfs_init_path(&path);
+	/* Search with the first key, to ensure we can reach it */
+	ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, &path, 0, 0);
+	if (ret) {
+		err |= MISSING_REFERENCER;
+		goto release_out;
+	}
+
+	node = path.nodes[level];
+	if (btrfs_header_bytenr(node) != bytenr) {
+		error("Extent [%llu %d] referencer bytenr mismatch, wanted: %llu, have: %llu",
+		      bytenr, nodesize, bytenr,
+		      btrfs_header_bytenr(node));
+		err |= BAD_REFERENCER;
+	}
+	if (btrfs_header_level(node) != level) {
+		error("Extent [%llu %d] referencer level mismatch, wanted: %d, have: %d",
+		      bytenr, nodesize, level,
+		      btrfs_header_level(node));
+		err |= BAD_REFERENCER;
+	}
+
+release_out:
+	btrfs_release_path(&path);
+out:
+	if (err & MISSING_REFERENCER) {
+		if (level < 0)
+			error("Extent [%llu %d] lost referencer(owner: %llu)",
+			       bytenr, nodesize, root_id);
+		else
+			error("Extent [%llu %d] lost referencer(owner: %llu, level: %u)",
+			       bytenr, nodesize, root_id, level);
+	}
+
+	return -err;
+}
+
 static int btrfs_fsck_reinit_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 			   struct btrfs_root *root, int overwrite)
 {
-- 
2.8.0




  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-26  3:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-26  3:48 [PATCH RFC 00/16] Introduce low memory usage btrfsck mode Qu Wenruo
2016-04-26  3:48 ` [PATCH RFC 01/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to check tree block backref in extent tree Qu Wenruo
2016-04-28 14:03   ` Josef Bacik
2016-04-26  3:48 ` [PATCH RFC 02/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to check data " Qu Wenruo
2016-04-28  1:43   ` [PATCH RFC v1.1 " Qu Wenruo
2016-04-28 14:08     ` Josef Bacik
2016-04-26  3:48 ` [PATCH RFC 03/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to query tree block level Qu Wenruo
2016-04-28 14:13   ` Josef Bacik
2016-04-29  3:35     ` Qu Wenruo
2016-04-29 13:51       ` Josef Bacik
2016-04-26  3:48 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2016-04-28 14:17   ` [PATCH RFC 04/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to check referencer of a backref Josef Bacik
2016-04-29  5:31     ` Qu Wenruo
2016-04-29 13:52       ` Josef Bacik
2016-05-03  0:56         ` Qu Wenruo
2016-04-28 14:31   ` Josef Bacik
2016-04-26  3:48 ` [PATCH RFC 05/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to check shared block ref Qu Wenruo
2016-04-28 14:19   ` Josef Bacik
2016-04-26  3:48 ` [PATCH RFC 06/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to check referencer for data backref Qu Wenruo
2016-04-28 14:22   ` Josef Bacik
2016-04-26  3:48 ` [PATCH RFC 07/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to check shared " Qu Wenruo
2016-04-28 14:23   ` Josef Bacik
2016-04-26  3:48 ` [PATCH RFC 08/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to check an extent Qu Wenruo
2016-04-28 14:26   ` Josef Bacik
2016-04-26  3:48 ` [PATCH RFC 09/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to check dev extent item Qu Wenruo
2016-04-28 14:27   ` Josef Bacik
2016-04-26  3:48 ` [PATCH RFC 10/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to check dev used space Qu Wenruo
2016-04-28 14:29   ` Josef Bacik
2016-04-26  3:48 ` [PATCH RFC 11/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to check block group item Qu Wenruo
2016-04-26  3:48 ` [PATCH RFC 12/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to check chunk item Qu Wenruo
2016-04-26  3:49 ` [PATCH RFC 13/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce hub function for later fsck Qu Wenruo
2016-04-26  3:49 ` [PATCH RFC 14/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to speed up fs tree check Qu Wenruo
2016-04-26  3:49 ` [PATCH RFC 15/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce traversal function for fsck Qu Wenruo
2016-04-26  3:49 ` [PATCH RFC 16/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce low memory mode Qu Wenruo
2016-04-26 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC 00/16] Introduce low memory usage btrfsck mode Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-04-28 14:32 ` Josef Bacik
2016-04-29  0:25   ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1461642543-4621-5-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).