From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:57214 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751080AbcFWJqz (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:46:55 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u5N9iSYC022235 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:46:54 -0400 Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com (e38.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.159]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 23qd1j4wr8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:46:53 -0400 Received: from localhost by e38.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 03:46:53 -0600 From: Chandan Rajendra To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: Chandan Rajendra , dsterba@suse.com, bo.li.liu@oracle.com Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: Force stripesize to the value of sectorsize Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:16:44 +0530 Message-Id: <1466675204-31299-1-git-send-email-chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Btrfs code currently assumes stripesize to be same as sectorsize. However Btrfs-progs (until commit df05c7ed455f519e6e15e46196392e4757257305) has been setting btrfs_super_block->stripesize to a value of 4096. This commit makes sure that the value of btrfs_super_block->stripesize is a power of 2. Later, it unconditionally sets btrfs_root->stripesize to sectorsize. Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 6 ++---- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index 54cca7a..60ce119 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -2806,7 +2806,7 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, nodesize = btrfs_super_nodesize(disk_super); sectorsize = btrfs_super_sectorsize(disk_super); - stripesize = btrfs_super_stripesize(disk_super); + stripesize = sectorsize; fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch = nodesize * (1 + ilog2(nr_cpu_ids)); fs_info->delalloc_batch = sectorsize * 512 * (1 + ilog2(nr_cpu_ids)); @@ -4133,9 +4133,7 @@ static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, btrfs_super_bytes_used(sb)); ret = -EINVAL; } - if (!is_power_of_2(btrfs_super_stripesize(sb)) || - ((btrfs_super_stripesize(sb) != sectorsize) && - (btrfs_super_stripesize(sb) != 4096))) { + if (!is_power_of_2(btrfs_super_stripesize(sb))) { btrfs_err(fs_info, "invalid stripesize %u", btrfs_super_stripesize(sb)); ret = -EINVAL; diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index c3a2900..64eec2c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -4694,12 +4694,12 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5) { raid_stripe_len = find_raid56_stripe_len(ndevs - 1, - btrfs_super_stripesize(info->super_copy)); + extent_root->stripesize); data_stripes = num_stripes - 1; } if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6) { raid_stripe_len = find_raid56_stripe_len(ndevs - 2, - btrfs_super_stripesize(info->super_copy)); + extent_root->stripesize); data_stripes = num_stripes - 2; } -- 2.5.5