From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix memory leak in reading btree blocks
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:33:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470252781-9455-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com> (raw)
So we can read a btree block via readahead or intentional read,
and we can end up with a memory leak when something happens as
follows,
1) readahead starts to read block A but does not wait for read
completion,
2) btree_readpage_end_io_hook finds that block A is corrupted,
and it needs to clear all block A's pages' uptodate bit.
3) meanwhile an intentional read kicks in and checks block A's
pages' uptodate to decide which page needs to be read.
4) when some pages have the uptodate bit during 3)'s check so
3) doesn't count them for eb->io_pages, but they are later
cleared by 2) so we has to readpage on the page, we get
the wrong eb->io_pages which results in a memory leak of
this block.
This fixes the problem by firstly getting all pages's locking and
then checking pages' uptodate bit.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index bd29b9b..a77050e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -5215,11 +5215,20 @@ int read_extent_buffer_pages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
lock_page(page);
}
locked_pages++;
+ }
+ /*
+ * We need to firstly lock all pages to make sure that
+ * the uptodate bit of our pages won't be affected by
+ * clear_extent_buffer_uptodate().
+ */
+ for (i = start_i; i < num_pages; i++) {
+ page = eb->pages[i];
if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
num_reads++;
all_uptodate = 0;
}
}
+
if (all_uptodate) {
if (start_i == 0)
set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &eb->bflags);
--
2.5.5
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-03 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-03 19:33 Liu Bo [this message]
2016-08-24 23:15 ` [PATCH] Btrfs: fix memory leak in reading btree blocks Liu Bo
2016-09-01 15:07 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470252781-9455-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).