[PATCH] btrfs: waiting on qgroup rescan should not always be interruptible

[PATCH] btrfs: waiting on qgroup rescan should not always be interruptible

[jeffm]

From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>

We wait on qgroup rescan completion in three places: file system
shutdown, the quota disable ioctl, and the rescan wait ioctl.  If the
user sends a signal while we're waiting, we continue happily along.  This
is expected behavior for the rescan wait ioctl.  It's racy in the shutdown
path but mostly works due to other unrelated synchronization points.
In the quota disable path, it Oopses the kernel pretty much immediately.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.4+
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |  2 +-
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c   |  2 +-
 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c  | 12 +++++++++---
 fs/btrfs/qgroup.h  |  3 ++-
 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 59febfb..f35a7de 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -3851,7 +3851,7 @@ void close_ctree(struct btrfs_root *root)
 	smp_mb();
 
 	/* wait for the qgroup rescan worker to stop */
-	btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(fs_info);
+	btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(fs_info, false);
 
 	/* wait for the uuid_scan task to finish */
 	down(&fs_info->uuid_tree_rescan_sem);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 14ed1e9..b2a2da5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -5084,7 +5084,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan_wait(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
 	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	return btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(root->fs_info);
+	return btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(root->fs_info, true);
 }
 
 static long _btrfs_ioctl_set_received_subvol(struct file *file,
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
index 93ee1c1..de08b12 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
@@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ int btrfs_quota_disable(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		goto out;
 	fs_info->quota_enabled = 0;
 	fs_info->pending_quota_state = 0;
-	btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(fs_info);
+	btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(fs_info, false);
 	spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
 	quota_root = fs_info->quota_root;
 	fs_info->quota_root = NULL;
@@ -2487,7 +2487,8 @@ btrfs_qgroup_rescan(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
+int btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
+				     bool interruptible)
 {
 	int running;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -2498,9 +2499,14 @@ int btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 	spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
 	mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
 
-	if (running)
+	if (!running)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (interruptible)
 		ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(
 					&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion);
+	else
+		wait_for_completion(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion);
 
 	return ret;
 }
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.h b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.h
index 710887c..af3e557 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.h
@@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ int btrfs_quota_disable(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 			struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
 int btrfs_qgroup_rescan(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
 void btrfs_qgroup_rescan_resume(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
-int btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
+int btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
+				     bool interruptible);
 int btrfs_add_qgroup_relation(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 			      struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 src, u64 dst);
 int btrfs_del_qgroup_relation(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
-- 
2.7.1

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: waiting on qgroup rescan should not always be interruptible

[David Sterba]

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:08:06PM -0400, jeffm@suse.com wrote:
> From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
> 
> We wait on qgroup rescan completion in three places: file system
> shutdown, the quota disable ioctl, and the rescan wait ioctl.  If the
> user sends a signal while we're waiting, we continue happily along.  This
> is expected behavior for the rescan wait ioctl.  It's racy in the shutdown
> path but mostly works due to other unrelated synchronization points.
> In the quota disable path, it Oopses the kernel pretty much immediately.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.4+
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>