From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: improve check_node to avoid reading corrupted nodes
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:23:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473899004-29697-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com> (raw)
We need to check items in a node to make sure that we're reading
a valid one, otherwise we could get various crashes while processing
delayed_refs.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index b401e6d..1059e5d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -547,9 +547,10 @@ static int check_tree_block_fsid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
}
#define CORRUPT(reason, eb, root, slot) \
- btrfs_crit(root->fs_info, "corrupt leaf, %s: block=%llu," \
- "root=%llu, slot=%d", reason, \
- btrfs_header_bytenr(eb), root->objectid, slot)
+ btrfs_crit(root->fs_info, "corrupt %s, %s: block=%llu," \
+ " root=%llu, slot=%d", \
+ btrfs_header_level(eb) == 0 ? "leaf" : "node",\
+ reason, btrfs_header_bytenr(eb), root->objectid, slot)
static noinline int check_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root,
struct extent_buffer *leaf)
@@ -640,6 +641,10 @@ static noinline int check_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root,
static int check_node(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *node)
{
unsigned long nr = btrfs_header_nritems(node);
+ struct btrfs_key key, next_key;
+ int slot;
+ u64 bytenr;
+ int ret = 0;
if (nr == 0 || nr > BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(root)) {
btrfs_crit(root->fs_info,
@@ -647,7 +652,26 @@ static int check_node(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *node)
node->start, root->objectid, nr);
return -EIO;
}
- return 0;
+
+ for (slot = 0; slot < nr - 1; slot++) {
+ bytenr = btrfs_node_blockptr(node, slot);
+ btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(node, &key, slot);
+ btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(node, &next_key, slot + 1);
+
+ if (!bytenr) {
+ CORRUPT("invalid item slot", node, root, slot);
+ ret = -EIO;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (btrfs_comp_cpu_keys(&key, &next_key) >= 0) {
+ CORRUPT("bad key order", node, root, slot);
+ ret = -EIO;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+out:
+ return ret;
}
static int btree_readpage_end_io_hook(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
--
2.5.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-
next reply other threads:[~2016-09-15 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-15 0:23 Liu Bo [this message]
2016-09-21 13:44 ` [PATCH] Btrfs: improve check_node to avoid reading corrupted nodes David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1473899004-29697-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).