From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@fb.com>, <jack@suse.com>, <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
<dchinner@redhat.com>, <hch@lst.de>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] writeback: introduce super_operations->write_metadata
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:57:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474405068-27841-5-git-send-email-jbacik@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1474405068-27841-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fb.com>
Now that we have metadata counters in the VM, we need to provide a way to kick
writeback on dirty metadata. Introduce super_operations->write_metadata. This
allows file systems to deal with writing back any dirty metadata we need based
on the writeback needs of the system. Since there is no inode to key off of we
need a list in the bdi for dirty super blocks to be added. From there we can
find any dirty sb's on the bdi we are currently doing writeback on and call into
their ->write_metadata callback.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
fs/super.c | 7 ++++
include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h | 2 ++
include/linux/fs.h | 4 +++
mm/backing-dev.c | 2 ++
5 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index aafdb11..8cd072e 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -1464,6 +1464,31 @@ static long writeback_chunk_size(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
return pages;
}
+static long writeback_sb_metadata(struct super_block *sb,
+ struct bdi_writeback *wb,
+ struct wb_writeback_work *work)
+{
+ struct writeback_control wbc = {
+ .sync_mode = work->sync_mode,
+ .tagged_writepages = work->tagged_writepages,
+ .for_kupdate = work->for_kupdate,
+ .for_background = work->for_background,
+ .for_sync = work->for_sync,
+ .range_cyclic = work->range_cyclic,
+ .range_start = 0,
+ .range_end = LLONG_MAX,
+ };
+ long write_chunk;
+
+ write_chunk = writeback_chunk_size(wb, work);
+ wbc.nr_to_write = write_chunk;
+ sb->s_op->write_metadata(sb, &wbc);
+ work->nr_pages -= write_chunk - wbc.nr_to_write;
+
+ return write_chunk - wbc.nr_to_write;
+}
+
+
/*
* Write a portion of b_io inodes which belong to @sb.
*
@@ -1490,6 +1515,7 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
unsigned long start_time = jiffies;
long write_chunk;
long wrote = 0; /* count both pages and inodes */
+ bool done = false;
while (!list_empty(&wb->b_io)) {
struct inode *inode = wb_inode(wb->b_io.prev);
@@ -1606,12 +1632,18 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
* background threshold and other termination conditions.
*/
if (wrote) {
- if (time_is_before_jiffies(start_time + HZ / 10UL))
- break;
- if (work->nr_pages <= 0)
+ if (time_is_before_jiffies(start_time + HZ / 10UL) ||
+ work->nr_pages <= 0) {
+ done = true;
break;
+ }
}
}
+ if (!done && sb->s_op->write_metadata) {
+ spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+ wrote += writeback_sb_metadata(sb, wb, work);
+ spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+ }
return wrote;
}
@@ -1620,6 +1652,7 @@ static long __writeback_inodes_wb(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
{
unsigned long start_time = jiffies;
long wrote = 0;
+ bool done = false;
while (!list_empty(&wb->b_io)) {
struct inode *inode = wb_inode(wb->b_io.prev);
@@ -1639,12 +1672,39 @@ static long __writeback_inodes_wb(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
/* refer to the same tests at the end of writeback_sb_inodes */
if (wrote) {
- if (time_is_before_jiffies(start_time + HZ / 10UL))
- break;
- if (work->nr_pages <= 0)
+ if (time_is_before_jiffies(start_time + HZ / 10UL) ||
+ work->nr_pages <= 0) {
+ done = true;
break;
+ }
}
}
+
+ if (!done && wb_stat(wb, WB_METADATA_DIRTY_BYTES)) {
+ LIST_HEAD(list);
+
+ spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+ spin_lock(&wb->bdi->sb_list_lock);
+ list_splice_init(&wb->bdi->dirty_sb_list, &list);
+ while (!list_empty(&list)) {
+ struct super_block *sb;
+
+ sb = list_first_entry(&list, struct super_block,
+ s_bdi_dirty_list);
+ list_move_tail(&sb->s_bdi_dirty_list,
+ &wb->bdi->dirty_sb_list);
+ if (!sb->s_op->write_metadata)
+ continue;
+ if (!trylock_super(sb))
+ continue;
+ spin_unlock(&wb->bdi->sb_list_lock);
+ wrote += writeback_sb_metadata(sb, wb, work);
+ spin_lock(&wb->bdi->sb_list_lock);
+ up_read(&sb->s_umount);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&wb->bdi->sb_list_lock);
+ spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
+ }
/* Leave any unwritten inodes on b_io */
return wrote;
}
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index c2ff475..eb32913 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags,
spin_lock_init(&s->s_inode_list_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_inodes_wb);
spin_lock_init(&s->s_inode_wblist_lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_bdi_dirty_list);
if (list_lru_init_memcg(&s->s_dentry_lru))
goto fail;
@@ -305,6 +306,8 @@ void deactivate_locked_super(struct super_block *s)
{
struct file_system_type *fs = s->s_type;
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&s->s_active)) {
+ struct backing_dev_info *bdi = s->s_bdi;
+
cleancache_invalidate_fs(s);
unregister_shrinker(&s->s_shrink);
fs->kill_sb(s);
@@ -317,6 +320,10 @@ void deactivate_locked_super(struct super_block *s)
list_lru_destroy(&s->s_dentry_lru);
list_lru_destroy(&s->s_inode_lru);
+ spin_lock(&bdi->sb_list_lock);
+ list_del_init(&s->s_bdi_dirty_list);
+ spin_unlock(&bdi->sb_list_lock);
+
put_filesystem(fs);
put_super(s);
} else {
diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
index cef0f24..11cea63 100644
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
+++ b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
@@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ struct backing_dev_info {
struct timer_list laptop_mode_wb_timer;
+ spinlock_t sb_list_lock;
+ struct list_head dirty_sb_list;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
struct dentry *debug_dir;
struct dentry *debug_stats;
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index f3f0b4c8..f521187 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1430,6 +1430,8 @@ struct super_block {
spinlock_t s_inode_wblist_lock;
struct list_head s_inodes_wb; /* writeback inodes */
+
+ struct list_head s_bdi_dirty_list;
};
/* Helper functions so that in most cases filesystems will
@@ -1805,6 +1807,8 @@ struct super_operations {
struct shrink_control *);
long (*free_cached_objects)(struct super_block *,
struct shrink_control *);
+ void (*write_metadata)(struct super_block *sb,
+ struct writeback_control *wbc);
};
/*
diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index f0695b0..541f532 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -785,6 +785,8 @@ int bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
bdi->max_prop_frac = FPROP_FRAC_BASE;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdi->bdi_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdi->wb_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdi->dirty_sb_list);
+ spin_lock_init(&bdi->sb_list_lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&bdi->wb_waitq);
ret = cgwb_bdi_init(bdi);
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-20 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-20 20:57 [PATCH 0/4][V3] metadata throttling in writeback patches Josef Bacik
2016-09-20 20:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] remove mapping from balance_dirty_pages*() Josef Bacik
2016-09-20 20:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] writeback: allow for dirty metadata accounting Josef Bacik
2016-09-22 11:18 ` Jan Kara
2016-09-22 13:34 ` Josef Bacik
2016-09-22 19:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-09-20 20:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] writeback: convert WB_WRITTEN/WB_DIRITED counters to bytes Josef Bacik
2016-09-22 11:34 ` Jan Kara
2016-09-22 13:35 ` Josef Bacik
2016-09-20 20:57 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2016-09-22 11:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] writeback: introduce super_operations->write_metadata Jan Kara
2016-09-22 13:36 ` Josef Bacik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-06-22 14:23 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Support for metadata specific accounting Nikolay Borisov
2017-06-22 14:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] writeback: introduce super_operations->write_metadata Nikolay Borisov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1474405068-27841-5-git-send-email-jbacik@fb.com \
--to=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).